Shared governance as a pathway to regional cooperation and development through the <scp>ItaipuCorpus</scp>

Abstract Motivation Cross‐border cooperation remains a critical challenge for sustainable development in regions marked by historical rivalries, geopolitical asymmetries, and socioenvironmental vulnerabilities. The Itaipu Binacional Hydroelectric Plant, jointly governed by Brazil and Paraguay, offers a unique case for examining how shared governance can transform potential conflict into coordinated development in South America. Purpose This study investigates how the institutional design and historical evolution of Itaipu Binacional enabled regional cooperation and development between Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina. The research addresses the following question: how did shared governance in the context of Itaipu Binacional contribute to facilitating regional cooperation and promoting development between Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina? Approach and Methods The analysis combines a historical descriptive approach with a critical institutional and legal review. The study draws on international treaties, national legislation, internal statutes, and empirical data published by Itaipu Binacional. The literature on hydrodiplomacy, regional integration, and consensual hydro‐hegemony frames the theoretical discussion. Findings The findings suggest that Itaipu Binacional has served as a functional model of shared governance, facilitating energy integration, political rapprochement, and the creation of institutional mechanisms for cross‐country cooperation. However, the project also exposed issues associated with unequal distribution of economic benefits, legal asymmetries, and the displacement of local communities—especially affecting the Guarani people. Although Brazil exercised hegemonic influence, it did so through a framework of negotiated parity, reinforcing the relevance of consensual hydro‐hegemony as an analytical lens. Policy Implications The Itaipu experience underscores the potential of shared governance to promote development and prevent conflict in the Global South. Future infrastructure projects should incorporate inclusive governance models, equitable benefit‐sharing mechanisms, and robust environmental safeguards. Institutional innovation, transparency, and participatory frameworks are essential to ensure that regional cooperation is effective and just.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development Policy Review
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70040
Primary Topic
Economic Zones and Regional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared governance as a pathway to regional cooperation and development through the ItaipuCorpus

Júlia Souza Luiz, Marina Rodrigues Mesquita
Development Policy Review
Economic Zones and Regional Development
article

Shared governance as a pathway to regional cooperation and development through the ItaipuCorpus

Júlia Souza Luiz, Marina Rodrigues Mesquita
article en

Abstract

Abstract Motivation Cross‐border cooperation remains a critical challenge for sustainable development in regions marked by historical rivalries, geopolitical asymmetries, and socioenvironmental vulnerabilities. The Itaipu Binacional Hydroelectric Plant, jointly governed by Brazil and Paraguay, offers a unique case for examining how shared governance can transform potential conflict into coordinated development in South America. Purpose This study investigates how the institutional design and historical evolution of Itaipu Binacional enabled regional cooperation and development between Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina. The research addresses the following question: how did shared governance in the context of Itaipu Binacional contribute to facilitating regional cooperation and promoting development between Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina? Approach and Methods The analysis combines a historical descriptive approach with a critical institutional and legal review. The study draws on international treaties, national legislation, internal statutes, and empirical data published by Itaipu Binacional. The literature on hydrodiplomacy, regional integration, and consensual hydro‐hegemony frames the theoretical discussion. Findings The findings suggest that Itaipu Binacional has served as a functional model of shared governance, facilitating energy integration, political rapprochement, and the creation of institutional mechanisms for cross‐country cooperation. However, the project also exposed issues associated with unequal distribution of economic benefits, legal asymmetries, and the displacement of local communities—especially affecting the Guarani people. Although Brazil exercised hegemonic influence, it did so through a framework of negotiated parity, reinforcing the relevance of consensual hydro‐hegemony as an analytical lens. Policy Implications The Itaipu experience underscores the potential of shared governance to promote development and prevent conflict in the Global South. Future infrastructure projects should incorporate inclusive governance models, equitable benefit‐sharing mechanisms, and robust environmental safeguards. Institutional innovation, transparency, and participatory frameworks are essential to ensure that regional cooperation is effective and just.

Development Policy ReviewVol. 43(6)
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Economic Zones and Regional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.