Effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization compared to cervical traction alone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy

Cervical radiculopathy is a painful condition caused by compression or irritation of the cervical nerve roots, often resulting in neck pain radiating into the upper limb. This condition can impair daily function, reduce mobility, and increase disability. Intermittent cervical traction is commonly used to relieve pressure on the affected nerve roots, while neural mobilization is a therapeutic technique aimed at restoring nerve movement and reducing mechanical sensitivity. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction combined with neural mobilization versus intermittent cervical traction alone in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. A total of twenty participants were selected and divided into two equal groups. Group A received intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization, while Group B received intermittent cervical traction alone. Both groups underwent treatment over a four-week period. Pain intensity, functional ability, disability level, and cervical range of motion were assessed using standardized clinical measures before and after the intervention. The results demonstrated that both treatment approaches were beneficial in reducing symptoms and improving cervical function. However, participants in the group receiving the combined intervention showed significantly greater improvements in pain reduction, functional recovery, and cervical mobility compared to those receiving traction alone. These findings suggest that integrating neural mobilization with intermittent cervical traction enhances therapeutic outcomes in the management of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Exercise and Physical Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26647281.2025.v7.i2d.239
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization compared to cervical traction alone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy

G Saranya, S Dhivyadharshini
International Journal of Sports Exercise and Physical Education
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization compared to cervical traction alone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy

G Saranya, S Dhivyadharshini
article en

Abstract

Cervical radiculopathy is a painful condition caused by compression or irritation of the cervical nerve roots, often resulting in neck pain radiating into the upper limb. This condition can impair daily function, reduce mobility, and increase disability. Intermittent cervical traction is commonly used to relieve pressure on the affected nerve roots, while neural mobilization is a therapeutic technique aimed at restoring nerve movement and reducing mechanical sensitivity. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction combined with neural mobilization versus intermittent cervical traction alone in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. A total of twenty participants were selected and divided into two equal groups. Group A received intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization, while Group B received intermittent cervical traction alone. Both groups underwent treatment over a four-week period. Pain intensity, functional ability, disability level, and cervical range of motion were assessed using standardized clinical measures before and after the intervention. The results demonstrated that both treatment approaches were beneficial in reducing symptoms and improving cervical function. However, participants in the group receiving the combined intervention showed significantly greater improvements in pain reduction, functional recovery, and cervical mobility compared to those receiving traction alone. These findings suggest that integrating neural mobilization with intermittent cervical traction enhances therapeutic outcomes in the management of cervical radiculopathy.

International Journal of Sports Exercise and Physical EducationVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction along with neural mobilization compared to cervical traction alone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy — G Saranya, S Dhivyadharshini · International Journal of Sports Exercise and Physical Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS