ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE IN THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC SECTOR: DESIGNING TRANSPARENT AI SYSTEMS FOR POLICY DECISION-MAKING

The rapid and intensively high tempo of embedding artificial intelligence (AI) in the public domain has changed policy-making processes, especially in the US. Algorithmic rule-making, while presenting challenges of efficiency, predictive performance, and data-driven policy-making, also leads to basic questions of transparency, accountability, and regulation. This paper uses a systematic literature review (SLR) approach in analysing the influence of transparent AI systems in facilitating democratic governance and legitimacy within the U.S. public sector. The review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to provide rigor and replicability. A broad search on Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, supported by policy briefs of US agencies like the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and Government Accountability Office (GAO) resulted in 512 records. During the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 quality studies to be synthesized were identified. There are three clusters of themes overall: (i) the requirement for interpretable and explainable AI to foster citizen trust and policy legitimacy; (ii) systems of institutional accountability that strike a balance between risk and innovation; and (iii) mechanisms of oversight such as auditing, ethical rules, and governance structures that ensure responsible adoption of AI. The review picks up major gaps in current literature, i.e., empirical testing of algorithmic systems in actual policy environments and scarce citizen participation in AI governance mechanisms. While U.S. federal initiatives are being undertaken, e.g., the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights and NIST's AI Risk Management Framework, scaling transparency remains a concern. This research adds to the expanding literature on algorithmic governance through a systematic survey of extant knowledge, recognition of enduring gaps, and articulation of policy guidelines for transparent, accountable, and trustworthy AI systems in the U.S. public sector. Ultimately, the research asserts that algorithmic governance needs to draw upon technological advancements while protecting democratic values in order to protect fairness, legitimacy, and public trust in policymaking by AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Research and Management Science
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70382/tijfrms.v09i7.025
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE IN THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC SECTOR: DESIGNING TRANSPARENT AI SYSTEMS FOR POLICY DECISION-MAKING

CONFIDENCE ADIMCHI CHINONYEREM, ADEWUMI SUNDAY ADEPOJU
International Journal of Financial Research and Management Science
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE IN THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC SECTOR: DESIGNING TRANSPARENT AI SYSTEMS FOR POLICY DECISION-MAKING

CONFIDENCE ADIMCHI CHINONYEREM, ADEWUMI SUNDAY ADEPOJU
article en

Abstract

The rapid and intensively high tempo of embedding artificial intelligence (AI) in the public domain has changed policy-making processes, especially in the US. Algorithmic rule-making, while presenting challenges of efficiency, predictive performance, and data-driven policy-making, also leads to basic questions of transparency, accountability, and regulation. This paper uses a systematic literature review (SLR) approach in analysing the influence of transparent AI systems in facilitating democratic governance and legitimacy within the U.S. public sector. The review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to provide rigor and replicability. A broad search on Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, supported by policy briefs of US agencies like the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and Government Accountability Office (GAO) resulted in 512 records. During the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 quality studies to be synthesized were identified. There are three clusters of themes overall: (i) the requirement for interpretable and explainable AI to foster citizen trust and policy legitimacy; (ii) systems of institutional accountability that strike a balance between risk and innovation; and (iii) mechanisms of oversight such as auditing, ethical rules, and governance structures that ensure responsible adoption of AI. The review picks up major gaps in current literature, i.e., empirical testing of algorithmic systems in actual policy environments and scarce citizen participation in AI governance mechanisms. While U.S. federal initiatives are being undertaken, e.g., the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights and NIST's AI Risk Management Framework, scaling transparency remains a concern. This research adds to the expanding literature on algorithmic governance through a systematic survey of extant knowledge, recognition of enduring gaps, and articulation of policy guidelines for transparent, accountable, and trustworthy AI systems in the U.S. public sector. Ultimately, the research asserts that algorithmic governance needs to draw upon technological advancements while protecting democratic values in order to protect fairness, legitimacy, and public trust in policymaking by AI.

International Journal of Financial Research and Management Science
Delta State Polytechnic Ogwashi-Uku (NG), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.