Integrating machine learning and numerical analysis to characterise stress fields around structural defects in steel alloys

This study investigates the application of machine learning models – specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN–recurrent neural network (RNN) and CNN–graph neural network (GNN) architectures – for predicting stress fields in steel plates containing arbitrarily shaped pores under tensile loading. Among the models tested, CNN–GNN achieved the highest accuracy, with an R 2 of 0.95 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.93%, outperforming CNNs ( R 2 = 0.88, RMSE = 10.93%) and CNN–RNN ( R 2 = 0.92, RMSE = 7.41%). This advantage stems from CNN–GNN's graph-based architecture, which effectively models complex, non-linear stress distributions around irregular pores. Nevertheless, prediction accuracy decreases with larger pore sizes, increased pore count or when pores are near plate edges. Additionally, the CNN–GNN model performs most effectively with medium-strength alloys such as stainless steel 304, where stress distributions are more predictable. In contrast, its accuracy diminishes when applied to high-strength alloys like AISI D2 or low-strength alloys like ASTM A36. These variations reflect the unique mechanical properties of each alloy, which introduce greater complexity into the stress distribution and challenge the model's ability to generalise across different materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ironmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and Applications
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03019233251379930
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating machine learning and numerical analysis to characterise stress fields around structural defects in steel alloys

T. Ramachandran, Parveen Kumar, Nikunj Rachchh, A. Karthikeyan et al.
Ironmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and Applications
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Integrating machine learning and numerical analysis to characterise stress fields around structural defects in steel alloys

T. Ramachandran, Parveen Kumar, Nikunj Rachchh, A. Karthikeyan, Aman Shankhyan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the application of machine learning models – specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN–recurrent neural network (RNN) and CNN–graph neural network (GNN) architectures – for predicting stress fields in steel plates containing arbitrarily shaped pores under tensile loading. Among the models tested, CNN–GNN achieved the highest accuracy, with an R 2 of 0.95 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.93%, outperforming CNNs ( R 2 = 0.88, RMSE = 10.93%) and CNN–RNN ( R 2 = 0.92, RMSE = 7.41%). This advantage stems from CNN–GNN's graph-based architecture, which effectively models complex, non-linear stress distributions around irregular pores. Nevertheless, prediction accuracy decreases with larger pore sizes, increased pore count or when pores are near plate edges. Additionally, the CNN–GNN model performs most effectively with medium-strength alloys such as stainless steel 304, where stress distributions are more predictable. In contrast, its accuracy diminishes when applied to high-strength alloys like AISI D2 or low-strength alloys like ASTM A36. These variations reflect the unique mechanical properties of each alloy, which introduce greater complexity into the stress distribution and challenge the model's ability to generalise across different materials.

Ironmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and ApplicationsVol. 52(10)
Jain University (IN), Marwadi University (IN), Institute of Engineering (NP), Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Chitkara University (IN), Punjab Engineering College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating machine learning and numerical analysis to characterise stress fields around structural defects in steel alloys — T. Ramachandran, Parveen Kumar, et al. · Ironmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS