Prognostic Significance of Isolated Low-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Audiometric Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Hearing loss is a prevalent sensory impairment in older adults, linked to reduced quality of life, cognitive decline, and social isolation. While it usually begins in the high-frequency range, some individuals present with isolated low-frequency hearing loss (LFHL). The long-term prognostic implications of such frequency-specific patterns remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of long-term hearing deterioration by initial hearing loss type: LFHL, high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL), and combined-frequency hearing loss (CFHL). <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data from 10,261 patients who underwent at least two pure-tone audiometry assessments between 2011 and 2022 at a tertiary hospital. Each ear was treated as an independent observation. Hearing loss was defined as a threshold > 20 dB HL at 250, 500, 4000, or 8000 Hz. Participants were classified into normal hearing (NH), LFHL, HFHL, and CFHL groups. The outcome was a final four-frequency pure-tone average (4PTA) ≥ 40 dB HL. Logistic regression adjusted for age and sex was used, with subgroup analyses by follow-up duration. <b>Results</b>: HFHL (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.47-1.89) and CFHL (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.97-2.53) showed significantly higher risks of hearing loss compared with NH. LFHL did not show a significant increase (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.16). These results were consistent across follow-up durations, with CFHL showing the most extensive deterioration. <b>Conclusion</b>: HFHL is a strong predictor of long-term auditory decline, and risk is further elevated with CFHL. In contrast, isolated LFHL was not associated with increased risk, suggesting relatively favorable outcomes. Frequency-specific classification may aid risk stratification and long-term monitoring strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196749
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Significance of Isolated Low-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Audiometric Study

Chul Young Yoon, Young‐Joon Seo, Jiwon Kim, J. Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Prognostic Significance of Isolated Low-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Audiometric Study

Chul Young Yoon, Young‐Joon Seo, Jiwon Kim, J. Lee
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Hearing loss is a prevalent sensory impairment in older adults, linked to reduced quality of life, cognitive decline, and social isolation. While it usually begins in the high-frequency range, some individuals present with isolated low-frequency hearing loss (LFHL). The long-term prognostic implications of such frequency-specific patterns remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of long-term hearing deterioration by initial hearing loss type: LFHL, high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL), and combined-frequency hearing loss (CFHL). <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data from 10,261 patients who underwent at least two pure-tone audiometry assessments between 2011 and 2022 at a tertiary hospital. Each ear was treated as an independent observation. Hearing loss was defined as a threshold > 20 dB HL at 250, 500, 4000, or 8000 Hz. Participants were classified into normal hearing (NH), LFHL, HFHL, and CFHL groups. The outcome was a final four-frequency pure-tone average (4PTA) ≥ 40 dB HL. Logistic regression adjusted for age and sex was used, with subgroup analyses by follow-up duration. <b>Results</b>: HFHL (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.47-1.89) and CFHL (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.97-2.53) showed significantly higher risks of hearing loss compared with NH. LFHL did not show a significant increase (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.16). These results were consistent across follow-up durations, with CFHL showing the most extensive deterioration. <b>Conclusion</b>: HFHL is a strong predictor of long-term auditory decline, and risk is further elevated with CFHL. In contrast, isolated LFHL was not associated with increased risk, suggesting relatively favorable outcomes. Frequency-specific classification may aid risk stratification and long-term monitoring strategies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prognostic Significance of Isolated Low-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Audiometric Study — Chul Young Yoon, Young‐Joon Seo, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS