ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA MENGENAI WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN

This article analyzes the evidence in civil disputes concerning breach of contract, which arises when obligations are not fulfilled. Evidence plays a crucial role in substantiating claims in court. The rules governing the burden of proof, the categories of admissible evidence, and the judge’s evaluation of such evidence are all part of the issues addressed. The purpose of this research is to protect the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved, ensure an efficient legal system, and assess the evidence in contractual disputes. The research employs a normative legal method through statutory analysis. Written documents, witnesses, oaths, confessions, and presumptions are all examples of evidence. The plaintiff must demonstrate the defendant’s negligence. The court evaluates both the strength and the credibility of the evidence. The aim of this analysis is to ensure a fair trial. Achieving material truth and substantive justice requires an understanding of the burden of proof and the methods of evaluating evidence. Abstrak Artikel ini menganalisis pembuktian dalam sengketa perdata terkait wanprestasi dalam perjanjian, yang terjadi ketika kewajiban tidak terpenuhi. Pembuktian krusial untuk membuktikan dalil-dalil di persidangan. Rumusan masalah meliputi pengaturan beban pembuktian, jenis alat bukti yang diakui, dan penilaian hakim terhadap bukti. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis pembuktian dalam sengketa wanprestasi, memastikan proses peradilan yang efektif, serta melindungi hak dan kewajiban pihak-pihak. Metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif, menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan. Alat bukti meliputi dokumen tertulis, saksi, persangkaan, pengakuan, dan sumpah. Penggugat harus membuktikan kelalaian tergugat. Pengadilan menilai keabsahan dan kekuatan bukti. Analisis ini bertujuan memastikan peradilan yang adil. Pemahaman beban pembuktian dan penilaian bukti penting untuk mencapai kebenaran materiil dan keadilan substantif.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semarang Law Review (SLR)
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v6i2.12853
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA MENGENAI WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN

Komang Rama Agastya
Semarang Law Review (SLR)
Marriage and Family Dynamics
article

ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA MENGENAI WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN

Komang Rama Agastya
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the evidence in civil disputes concerning breach of contract, which arises when obligations are not fulfilled. Evidence plays a crucial role in substantiating claims in court. The rules governing the burden of proof, the categories of admissible evidence, and the judge’s evaluation of such evidence are all part of the issues addressed. The purpose of this research is to protect the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved, ensure an efficient legal system, and assess the evidence in contractual disputes. The research employs a normative legal method through statutory analysis. Written documents, witnesses, oaths, confessions, and presumptions are all examples of evidence. The plaintiff must demonstrate the defendant’s negligence. The court evaluates both the strength and the credibility of the evidence. The aim of this analysis is to ensure a fair trial. Achieving material truth and substantive justice requires an understanding of the burden of proof and the methods of evaluating evidence. Abstrak Artikel ini menganalisis pembuktian dalam sengketa perdata terkait wanprestasi dalam perjanjian, yang terjadi ketika kewajiban tidak terpenuhi. Pembuktian krusial untuk membuktikan dalil-dalil di persidangan. Rumusan masalah meliputi pengaturan beban pembuktian, jenis alat bukti yang diakui, dan penilaian hakim terhadap bukti. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis pembuktian dalam sengketa wanprestasi, memastikan proses peradilan yang efektif, serta melindungi hak dan kewajiban pihak-pihak. Metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif, menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan. Alat bukti meliputi dokumen tertulis, saksi, persangkaan, pengakuan, dan sumpah. Penggugat harus membuktikan kelalaian tergugat. Pengadilan menilai keabsahan dan kekuatan bukti. Analisis ini bertujuan memastikan peradilan yang adil. Pemahaman beban pembuktian dan penilaian bukti penting untuk mencapai kebenaran materiil dan keadilan substantif.

Semarang Law Review (SLR)Vol. 6(2)
Warmadewa University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA MENGENAI WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN — Komang Rama Agastya · Semarang Law Review (SLR) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS