Relational Colonialisms and a Turn to Place Based Epistemologies

This paper introduces a Relational Colonialisms Framework informed by Indigenous Pasifika epistemologies tā (time), vā (relational space), and teu le va (the ethic of relational care) to expand dominant sociological understandings of U.S. settler colonialism beyond the contiguous United States. I show how the temporal, spatial, and relational assumptions of settler colonial theory often obscure the layered, shifting, and entangled colonial logics operating across the U.S. territories. By foregrounding Indigenous ways of knowing, I argue for a place-based, relational approach that resists totalizing explanations and offers new tools for understanding the United States as both settler state and empire. I emphasize the centrality of the territories to the settler imperial structure, highlighting ongoing militarism, jurisdictional ambiguity, and oceanic governance. This paper offers an invitation to theorize settler colonialism in place, with attention to specificity, grounded in Indigenous relationality, and accountable to the communities who live with and resist empire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251367449
Primary Topic
Asian American and Pacific Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational Colonialisms and a Turn to Place Based Epistemologies

Sione Lynn Pili Lister
Critical Sociology
Asian American and Pacific Histories
article

Relational Colonialisms and a Turn to Place Based Epistemologies

Sione Lynn Pili Lister
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a Relational Colonialisms Framework informed by Indigenous Pasifika epistemologies tā (time), vā (relational space), and teu le va (the ethic of relational care) to expand dominant sociological understandings of U.S. settler colonialism beyond the contiguous United States. I show how the temporal, spatial, and relational assumptions of settler colonial theory often obscure the layered, shifting, and entangled colonial logics operating across the U.S. territories. By foregrounding Indigenous ways of knowing, I argue for a place-based, relational approach that resists totalizing explanations and offers new tools for understanding the United States as both settler state and empire. I emphasize the centrality of the territories to the settler imperial structure, highlighting ongoing militarism, jurisdictional ambiguity, and oceanic governance. This paper offers an invitation to theorize settler colonialism in place, with attention to specificity, grounded in Indigenous relationality, and accountable to the communities who live with and resist empire.

Critical Sociology
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Asian American and Pacific Histories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.