Aggressive Tax Planning in the Post-BEPS Era: Systematic Approach with Analysis and Examples <sup>1</sup>

Abstract Aggressive tax planning (ATP) does not have any legal definition or any other precise and established definition. Nor is it intended here to define precisely ATP. Instead, the primary purpose is to create a more general reference framework for aggressive tax planning after the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project of the OECD and G20 countries. Some situations or means of ATP have been left outside the scope of the BEPS project. In some cases, various occurrences of ATP are not covered by the implemented regulation, that is, the regulation can be considered underinclusive. Further, some of the proposed means are such that even though precise regulation has been targeted at these situations, the regulation has been implemented in such a way that its ultimate purpose can be circumvented. Finally, various ATP methods can rely on the fact that different states have not fully implemented the BEPS recommendations. The proposed framework can serve as a tool and incentive for both current and future tax policy discussions. Locating concrete ATP activities in the reference framework also illustrates for whom it would be possible and with what kind of legislative means to intervene in such phenomena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Tax Journal
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ntaxj-2024-0011
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aggressive Tax Planning in the Post-BEPS Era: Systematic Approach with Analysis and Examples 1

Reijo Knuutinen, Hannu Itälä
Nordic Tax Journal
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Aggressive Tax Planning in the Post-BEPS Era: Systematic Approach with Analysis and Examples 1

Reijo Knuutinen, Hannu Itälä
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aggressive tax planning (ATP) does not have any legal definition or any other precise and established definition. Nor is it intended here to define precisely ATP. Instead, the primary purpose is to create a more general reference framework for aggressive tax planning after the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project of the OECD and G20 countries. Some situations or means of ATP have been left outside the scope of the BEPS project. In some cases, various occurrences of ATP are not covered by the implemented regulation, that is, the regulation can be considered underinclusive. Further, some of the proposed means are such that even though precise regulation has been targeted at these situations, the regulation has been implemented in such a way that its ultimate purpose can be circumvented. Finally, various ATP methods can rely on the fact that different states have not fully implemented the BEPS recommendations. The proposed framework can serve as a tool and incentive for both current and future tax policy discussions. Locating concrete ATP activities in the reference framework also illustrates for whom it would be possible and with what kind of legislative means to intervene in such phenomena.

Nordic Tax Journal
University of Turku (FI), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Turun Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.