Prevalence, predictors, correlates, and dynamic changes in the NIAAA‐defined “recovery” definition
The NIAAA recovery definition was consistent with empirical outcomes exhibited by the R + A and R + LRD profiles, with both showing large psychosocial improvements, but who may represent different AUD phenotypes/stages. Despite R + A exhibiting a pattern of historically greater clinical severity, they demonstrated more stable remission compared with both the NIAAA recovery definition-inclusive R + LRD, but especially R + HRD. Ongoing alcohol use appears to destabilize remission, with heavier use associated with less psychosocial improvement and AUD reinstatement.
Authors
- John F. Kelly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-0750)
- Kyla Belisario (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-9531)
- James MacKillop
Institutions
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Institute for Health and Recovery (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
- Published
- 2025-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70172
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.06