Can CMIP6 Models Reproduce the Decadal‐to‐Seasonal Variabilities in Nitrogen Deposition Across Major Emission Hotspots?

Abstract Atmospheric nitrogen deposition modulates carbon sequestration by terrestrial ecosystems via nitrogen‐carbon interactions. The intertwined chemical and physical processes in nitrogen deposition and subsequent nitrogen‐carbon interactions pose challenges for Earth system model (ESM) in quantifying them. Here, we combine 30‐year nitrogen wet deposition measurements (1980–2014) with Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations to disentangle the nitrogen wet deposition variabilities across different scales. We show that observed decadal trends in nitrogen deposition can be reproduced by ESMs for the United States and Europe, but diverge in East Asia. Models generally fail to capture nitrogen deposition seasonality, with distinct driving factors of model errors for different nitrogen forms. The incorrect ammonia emission seasonality explains the bias in reduced nitrogen deposition, whereas precipitation scavenging and nitrogen oxides chemical oxidation collectively determine the seasonal bias of oxidized nitrogen deposition. Our results can facilitate the informed assessment of nitrogen‐carbon‐climate interactions under changing human activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl118824
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can CMIP6 Models Reproduce the Decadal‐to‐Seasonal Variabilities in Nitrogen Deposition Across Major Emission Hotspots?

Kengo Sudo, Fang Shang, Yanfeng He, Mingxu Liu
2 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
article

Can CMIP6 Models Reproduce the Decadal‐to‐Seasonal Variabilities in Nitrogen Deposition Across Major Emission Hotspots?

Kengo Sudo, Fang Shang, Yanfeng He, Mingxu Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric nitrogen deposition modulates carbon sequestration by terrestrial ecosystems via nitrogen‐carbon interactions. The intertwined chemical and physical processes in nitrogen deposition and subsequent nitrogen‐carbon interactions pose challenges for Earth system model (ESM) in quantifying them. Here, we combine 30‐year nitrogen wet deposition measurements (1980–2014) with Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations to disentangle the nitrogen wet deposition variabilities across different scales. We show that observed decadal trends in nitrogen deposition can be reproduced by ESMs for the United States and Europe, but diverge in East Asia. Models generally fail to capture nitrogen deposition seasonality, with distinct driving factors of model errors for different nitrogen forms. The incorrect ammonia emission seasonality explains the bias in reduced nitrogen deposition, whereas precipitation scavenging and nitrogen oxides chemical oxidation collectively determine the seasonal bias of oxidized nitrogen deposition. Our results can facilitate the informed assessment of nitrogen‐carbon‐climate interactions under changing human activities.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(18)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.