Genetic diversity is key to a nature‐positive future

Abstract Nature‐positive describes the concept of halting and then reversing the loss of biodiversity in a manner that is equitable to all, particularly indigenous peoples and local communities. Genetic diversity is the foundational component of biodiversity, underpinning species and ecosystem diversity. Genetic diversity is vital to resilience and ecosystem services. Whilst genetic diversity was included in early definitions of nature‐positive, it has been omitted from some more recent framings. Here we discuss why this omission may jeopardise the very ecosystems which the concept aims to protect. The limitations around data and methods for assessing genetic diversity are rapidly disappearing. Thus, we argue genetic diversity should be used for measuring nature‐positive outcomes. With advances in genetic and genomic technologies, this approach can even be more affordable than assessing species or ecosystems. If DNA‐based data are not available, indicators are available for inferring the status of genetic diversity with proxy data. Policy implications . It is both possible and beneficial to incorporate genetic diversity in biodiversity assessments for nature‐positive. It should be used in co‐developing management plans at local and national levels. Including genetic diversity in steps to build a nature‐positive future is thus essential if the concept is to achieve its aims. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70155
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic diversity is key to a nature‐positive future

Jeanette Hall, Deborah M. Leigh, David O’Brien, Sibelle Torres Vilaça et al.
1 citations
People and Nature
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
article

Genetic diversity is key to a nature‐positive future

Jeanette Hall, Deborah M. Leigh, David O’Brien, Sibelle Torres Vilaça, Gernot Segelbacher, Sean Hoban, Elana Bader
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nature‐positive describes the concept of halting and then reversing the loss of biodiversity in a manner that is equitable to all, particularly indigenous peoples and local communities. Genetic diversity is the foundational component of biodiversity, underpinning species and ecosystem diversity. Genetic diversity is vital to resilience and ecosystem services. Whilst genetic diversity was included in early definitions of nature‐positive, it has been omitted from some more recent framings. Here we discuss why this omission may jeopardise the very ecosystems which the concept aims to protect. The limitations around data and methods for assessing genetic diversity are rapidly disappearing. Thus, we argue genetic diversity should be used for measuring nature‐positive outcomes. With advances in genetic and genomic technologies, this approach can even be more affordable than assessing species or ecosystems. If DNA‐based data are not available, indicators are available for inferring the status of genetic diversity with proxy data. Policy implications . It is both possible and beneficial to incorporate genetic diversity in biodiversity assessments for nature‐positive. It should be used in co‐developing management plans at local and national levels. Including genetic diversity in steps to build a nature‐positive future is thus essential if the concept is to achieve its aims. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(11)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Freiburg (DE), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Morton Arboretum (US), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), University of Chicago (US), NovaBiotics (United Kingdom) (GB), LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (DE), Vale Technological Institute (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.