Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

<b>Background and Purpose:</b> Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective therapeutic method for improving upper limb motor function after stroke, yet its usage among occupational and physical therapists in Germany remains uncertain. The aim of the study is to investigate the knowledge of, frequency of use, and barriers to electrical stimulation use in stroke rehabilitation. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was conducted among German occupational and physical therapists working with stroke patients. Data were analyzed for frequency distributions, and associations between electrical stimulation usage and individual/organizational factors were assessed using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. <b>Results:</b> A total of <i>n</i> = 111 participants completed the survey (57 occupational and 54 physical therapists). Almost half (45%) reported regular electrical stimulation use, with 57% wanting to increase it. Use was higher among therapists with additional training (85% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.041), belief in electrical stimulation effectiveness during acute (87% vs. 59%, <i>p</i>=0.041) and early subacute stages (81% vs. 47%, <i>p</i>=0.027), sufficient time (78% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and device access (80% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.006). Therapists with over 10 years of experience used electrical stimulation less frequently (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although electrical stimulation shows promise in rehabilitation, further research is needed to assess the resources-such as time, equipment, and therapist training-required for its effective integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neural Plasticity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/np/4697720
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Lutz Vogt, Daniel Niederer, Sarah Tenberg, Steffen Müller
Neural Plasticity
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Lutz Vogt, Daniel Niederer, Sarah Tenberg, Steffen Müller
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Purpose:</b> Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective therapeutic method for improving upper limb motor function after stroke, yet its usage among occupational and physical therapists in Germany remains uncertain. The aim of the study is to investigate the knowledge of, frequency of use, and barriers to electrical stimulation use in stroke rehabilitation. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was conducted among German occupational and physical therapists working with stroke patients. Data were analyzed for frequency distributions, and associations between electrical stimulation usage and individual/organizational factors were assessed using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. <b>Results:</b> A total of <i>n</i> = 111 participants completed the survey (57 occupational and 54 physical therapists). Almost half (45%) reported regular electrical stimulation use, with 57% wanting to increase it. Use was higher among therapists with additional training (85% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.041), belief in electrical stimulation effectiveness during acute (87% vs. 59%, <i>p</i>=0.041) and early subacute stages (81% vs. 47%, <i>p</i>=0.027), sufficient time (78% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and device access (80% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.006). Therapists with over 10 years of experience used electrical stimulation less frequently (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although electrical stimulation shows promise in rehabilitation, further research is needed to assess the resources-such as time, equipment, and therapist training-required for its effective integration.

Neural PlasticityVol. 2025(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross‐Sectional Survey — Lutz Vogt, Daniel Niederer, et al. · Neural Plasticity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS