Goldschmidt’s geochemical classification of the elements: The evolution of a nuanced hypothesis

Abstract Victor Goldschmidt’s research on the geochemical classification and distribution of the elements provided a foundation to understand what he called the “geochemical evolution” of the elements. Students of geochemistry often first learn a simplified version of the geochemical classification with four categories—siderophile, chalcophile, lithophile, or atmophile—based on affinities for a metal, sulfide, silicate/oxide, or gaseous phase, respectively. However, Goldschmidt’s evolving presentations of this concept were far more nuanced, with several iterations between the early 1920s and late 1930s. In his pioneering 1923 treatment, Goldschmidt focused on the distribution of the elements among metallic, sulfide, and silicate phases during Earth’s initial differentiation into a metallic core, sulfide-oxide layer, mantle, and crust. He drew evidence from the distribution of the elements in different meteorite phases, as well as metallurgical partition coefficients among coexisting metal, sulfide, and silicate slag–observations that informed his division of elements into siderophile, chalcophile, and lithophile elements. Goldschmidt linked his classification to crystal chemical controls, which ultimately stem from properties of electron shell structures of the elements. He also emphasized that his classification scheme is subject to the boundary conditions given by thermodynamic variables such as temperature, pressure, and redox conditions. Goldschmidt expanded on a second evolutionary cycle for magmatic differentiation with extensive analytical studies of crustal lithologies, including igneous, sedimentary, and biologically mediated deposits, and by 1929 his classification evolved to include a fifth group for the “biophile elements.” His environment-dependent geochemical classification of the elements became part of his principles and geochemical laws that provide the foundation to understand how the abundances and the distribution of the elements were established both for Earth’s surface environment and for the planet as a whole. Goldschmidt’s articulation of Earth’s “geochemical evolution” is a framing that incorporated a prescient description of the co-evolving geosphere and biosphere, thus anticipating the principles of “mineral evolution” by more than half a century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Mineralogist
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2025-9788
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goldschmidt’s geochemical classification of the elements: The evolution of a nuanced hypothesis

K. Lodders, Robert M. Hazen
American Mineralogist
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Goldschmidt’s geochemical classification of the elements: The evolution of a nuanced hypothesis

K. Lodders, Robert M. Hazen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Victor Goldschmidt’s research on the geochemical classification and distribution of the elements provided a foundation to understand what he called the “geochemical evolution” of the elements. Students of geochemistry often first learn a simplified version of the geochemical classification with four categories—siderophile, chalcophile, lithophile, or atmophile—based on affinities for a metal, sulfide, silicate/oxide, or gaseous phase, respectively. However, Goldschmidt’s evolving presentations of this concept were far more nuanced, with several iterations between the early 1920s and late 1930s. In his pioneering 1923 treatment, Goldschmidt focused on the distribution of the elements among metallic, sulfide, and silicate phases during Earth’s initial differentiation into a metallic core, sulfide-oxide layer, mantle, and crust. He drew evidence from the distribution of the elements in different meteorite phases, as well as metallurgical partition coefficients among coexisting metal, sulfide, and silicate slag–observations that informed his division of elements into siderophile, chalcophile, and lithophile elements. Goldschmidt linked his classification to crystal chemical controls, which ultimately stem from properties of electron shell structures of the elements. He also emphasized that his classification scheme is subject to the boundary conditions given by thermodynamic variables such as temperature, pressure, and redox conditions. Goldschmidt expanded on a second evolutionary cycle for magmatic differentiation with extensive analytical studies of crustal lithologies, including igneous, sedimentary, and biologically mediated deposits, and by 1929 his classification evolved to include a fifth group for the “biophile elements.” His environment-dependent geochemical classification of the elements became part of his principles and geochemical laws that provide the foundation to understand how the abundances and the distribution of the elements were established both for Earth’s surface environment and for the planet as a whole. Goldschmidt’s articulation of Earth’s “geochemical evolution” is a framing that incorporated a prescient description of the co-evolving geosphere and biosphere, thus anticipating the principles of “mineral evolution” by more than half a century.

American Mineralogist
Planetary Science Institute (US), Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.