Exploring linguistic and cognitive-communicative aspects of vernacular toponyms: a comparative study of English and Kazakh languages

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the vernacular toponymy of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom through analysis of their linguistic (phonetic, word-formation, lexical-semantic) and cognitive-communicative features. By considering the features of vernacular content, phonetic, word-formation, lexical, cognitive, and communicative resources in the Kazakh and English languages are compared. It was determined that the toponyms of Great Britain retained the phonetic nature of the English language and loanwords from French and other languages are rarely used. The examination of word-formation resources shows that in the toponyms of Great Britain, the word-formation elements of the English language were most often used; in the Kazakh toponyms, both Kazakh and Russian word-formation resources were used. In lexical-semantic terms, both Kazakh and English languages had approximately the same indicators. Lexical and semantic groups, such as lexemes associated with spatial relations, the association of people on national, social, and gender grounds, historical names, and people’s employment, are identified. Nominations pertaining to sarcastic and metaphorical linkages were also observed from a communicative and cognitive perspective. The statistics were given in tables. This study can be used to compare toponyms in different structural languages and examine the lexical-semantic, linguistic, and cultural nature of toponyms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-0024
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring linguistic and cognitive-communicative aspects of vernacular toponyms: a comparative study of English and Kazakh languages

Aigul Bizhkenova, Saltanat Davletova
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
Categorization, perception, and language
article

Exploring linguistic and cognitive-communicative aspects of vernacular toponyms: a comparative study of English and Kazakh languages

Aigul Bizhkenova, Saltanat Davletova
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the vernacular toponymy of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom through analysis of their linguistic (phonetic, word-formation, lexical-semantic) and cognitive-communicative features. By considering the features of vernacular content, phonetic, word-formation, lexical, cognitive, and communicative resources in the Kazakh and English languages are compared. It was determined that the toponyms of Great Britain retained the phonetic nature of the English language and loanwords from French and other languages are rarely used. The examination of word-formation resources shows that in the toponyms of Great Britain, the word-formation elements of the English language were most often used; in the Kazakh toponyms, both Kazakh and Russian word-formation resources were used. In lexical-semantic terms, both Kazakh and English languages had approximately the same indicators. Lexical and semantic groups, such as lexemes associated with spatial relations, the association of people on national, social, and gender grounds, historical names, and people’s employment, are identified. Nominations pertaining to sarcastic and metaphorical linkages were also observed from a communicative and cognitive perspective. The statistics were given in tables. This study can be used to compare toponyms in different structural languages and examine the lexical-semantic, linguistic, and cultural nature of toponyms.

Lodz Papers in PragmaticsVol. 21(2)
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.