Evaluating the Fairness of Michelin Star Ratings as Indicators of Restaurants’ ESG Performance and Sustainable Culinary Quality

This study quantitatively analyzes how fairly the Michelin Guide’s star ratings reflect restaurants’ ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) management and sustainable gastronomy quality. Using open access data, the research statistically examines the relationships between Michelin stars and Green Stars (sustainability certification), as well as the effects of various factors such as price, region, descriptions, facilities, and menus. The results show that restaurants with the Green Star certification are more likely to receive higher star ratings. Still, this tendency is mainly concentrated among high end restaurants, and there is significant inequality across regions and price levels. While eco-friendly keywords, facilities, and menu items are effective in earning the Green Star, they have a limited impact on star ratings. Although Michelin still holds considerable authority, the study concludes that true fairness requires the official expansion of ESG criteria and improvements in the transparency and balance of the evaluation system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American journal of student research.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70251/hyjr2348.35353366
Primary Topic
Culinary Culture and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Fairness of Michelin Star Ratings as Indicators of Restaurants’ ESG Performance and Sustainable Culinary Quality

A Park
American journal of student research.
Culinary Culture and Tourism
article

Evaluating the Fairness of Michelin Star Ratings as Indicators of Restaurants’ ESG Performance and Sustainable Culinary Quality

A Park
article en

Abstract

This study quantitatively analyzes how fairly the Michelin Guide’s star ratings reflect restaurants’ ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) management and sustainable gastronomy quality. Using open access data, the research statistically examines the relationships between Michelin stars and Green Stars (sustainability certification), as well as the effects of various factors such as price, region, descriptions, facilities, and menus. The results show that restaurants with the Green Star certification are more likely to receive higher star ratings. Still, this tendency is mainly concentrated among high end restaurants, and there is significant inequality across regions and price levels. While eco-friendly keywords, facilities, and menu items are effective in earning the Green Star, they have a limited impact on star ratings. Although Michelin still holds considerable authority, the study concludes that true fairness requires the official expansion of ESG criteria and improvements in the transparency and balance of the evaluation system.

American journal of student research.
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Culinary Culture and Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the Fairness of Michelin Star Ratings as Indicators of Restaurants’ ESG Performance and Sustainable Culinary Quality — A Park · American journal of student research. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS