“I Don’t Want to Make Myself Look Like a Trouble-Maker”: Faculty and Staff Perspectives on Bystander Intervention in Academic Sexual Harassment Situations

This study shares findings of interviews with 25 faculty and staff from across the United States on their perspective on bystander intervention (BI) during instances of sexual harassment (SH) within academia. Factors that hindered BI included fears of retaliation, power dynamics, and perceived impacts on safety and career advancement. Facilitators of action included knowledge of SH and prior victimization; positionality and social identity were discussed as further impacting BI. Various types of bystander action were discussed, primarily focused on "delayed" responses. Findings underscore the critical need for BI programs tailored to address the nuanced challenges inherent to academia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Violence Against Women
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251379424
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Don’t Want to Make Myself Look Like a Trouble-Maker”: Faculty and Staff Perspectives on Bystander Intervention in Academic Sexual Harassment Situations

Iris F. McMillan, Enoch Boafo Amponsah, Sarah McMahon, Annelise Mennicke et al.
Violence Against Women
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

“I Don’t Want to Make Myself Look Like a Trouble-Maker”: Faculty and Staff Perspectives on Bystander Intervention in Academic Sexual Harassment Situations

Iris F. McMillan, Enoch Boafo Amponsah, Sarah McMahon, Annelise Mennicke, Jill C. Hoxmeier, Lauren Manley
article en

Abstract

This study shares findings of interviews with 25 faculty and staff from across the United States on their perspective on bystander intervention (BI) during instances of sexual harassment (SH) within academia. Factors that hindered BI included fears of retaliation, power dynamics, and perceived impacts on safety and career advancement. Facilitators of action included knowledge of SH and prior victimization; positionality and social identity were discussed as further impacting BI. Various types of bystander action were discussed, primarily focused on "delayed" responses. Findings underscore the critical need for BI programs tailored to address the nuanced challenges inherent to academia.

Violence Against Women
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I Don’t Want to Make Myself Look Like a Trouble-Maker”: Faculty and Staff Perspectives on Bystander Intervention in Academic Sexual Harassment Situations — Iris F. McMillan, Enoch Boafo Amponsah, et al. · Violence Against Women (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS