Prácticas tecnológicas en Puesto El Frío

We analyze the technological practices of hunter-gatherer societies that inhabited the open-air site of Puesto El Frío (La María Archaeological Locality, Santa Cruz) during the Late Holocene. Our study focuses on both surface and stratigraphic stone assemblages, considering factors related to the formation of the archaeological record. These groups applied different strategies for tool production, managing rocks from various sources. They acquired the raw material through different mechanisms: siliceous stones were obtained locally while obsidian came from more distant locations. Knapping activities reflect a structured use of the landscape observed in the locality: decortication was performed at nearby quarries, whereas core reduction and final tool shaping took place at the site. A variety of techniques were employed, mostly involving low labor investment, although some artifacts —such as bifaces and projectile points— required greater work and/or conservation. In this way, a toolkit was produced for multiple tasks associated with campsite activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Relaciones
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24215/18521479e110
Primary Topic
Archaeological and Geological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prácticas tecnológicas en Puesto El Frío

Ariel David Frank, Manuel Enrique Cueto, Fabiana Skarbun, Rafael Sebastián Paunero
Relaciones
Archaeological and Geological Studies
article

Prácticas tecnológicas en Puesto El Frío

Ariel David Frank, Manuel Enrique Cueto, Fabiana Skarbun, Rafael Sebastián Paunero
article en

Abstract

We analyze the technological practices of hunter-gatherer societies that inhabited the open-air site of Puesto El Frío (La María Archaeological Locality, Santa Cruz) during the Late Holocene. Our study focuses on both surface and stratigraphic stone assemblages, considering factors related to the formation of the archaeological record. These groups applied different strategies for tool production, managing rocks from various sources. They acquired the raw material through different mechanisms: siliceous stones were obtained locally while obsidian came from more distant locations. Knapping activities reflect a structured use of the landscape observed in the locality: decortication was performed at nearby quarries, whereas core reduction and final tool shaping took place at the site. A variety of techniques were employed, mostly involving low labor investment, although some artifacts —such as bifaces and projectile points— required greater work and/or conservation. In this way, a toolkit was produced for multiple tasks associated with campsite activities.

RelacionesVol. 50
Centro Científico Tecnológico - La Plata (AR), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Archaeological and Geological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.