A patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer found to have mosaic <i>TP53</i> likely pathogenic variant

A 36-year-old, nulligravid woman with a history of controlled eosinophilic esophagitis, asthma, and dense fibrocystic breasts was referred to the Breast Health Center after abnormal screening mammography. She reported recent fatigue and intermittent diarrhea but had a negative colonoscopy and food allergy testing this year. Her family history was significant for a maternal grandmother with a question of uterine cancer, a maternal grandfather who died of renal cancer at age 62 years, a paternal grandmother who died of brain cancer at age 56 years, a paternal grandfather who died of brain cancer at age 80 years, and a history of premalignant changes in the esophagus in her father. She has never smoked tobacco and consumes zero to three drinks of alcohol weekly. She has been physically active in multiple sports, including biking and swimming, and played the cello. Mammography demonstrated extremely dense breast tissue with new calcifications in both breasts. Diagnostic mammography demonstrated indeterminate grouped calcifications spanning 19 mm in the right breast at 5 o'clock and 7 mm in the left breast 12 o'clock. She subsequently underwent stereotactic needle biopsies of both areas, which revealed right breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), nuclear grade 3, with 90% estrogen receptor (ER) expression; and left ductal carcinoma, nuclear grade 3, with 95% ER expression, 40% progesterone receptor (PR) expression, negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status, and a Ki-67 index of 40%. Within the left breast biopsy there was an absence of myoepithelial cells, raising concern that the findings reflected an unusual type of invasive carcinoma. She then underwent bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which revealed the known areas of DCIS in the bilateral breasts and also revealed a 1.0-cm mass inferior to the left breast DCIS at 12 o'clock that was considered suspicious. On subsequent ultrasound, it corresponded to an 8-mm mass in the left breast at 10 o'clock. A biopsy of the mass demonstrated a spindle cell tumor, favoring malignant phyllodes tumor with pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation that was negative for ER, PR, and HER2 (triple-negative), with a Ki-67 index of 30%. At her multidisciplinary consultation, she was referred for genetic evaluation having met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria based on her diagnosis of breast cancer when younger than 50 years.1 Given the concern for invasive left breast cancer and possible need for chemotherapy, she was also referred for fertility preservation. She completed a comprehensive 76-gene germline genetic test, which revealed tumor protein p53 (TP53) likely pathogenic variant (LPV; c.716A>G; p.N239S). Pathogenic variants (PVs) and LPVs are DNA sequence changes that are associated with increased risk of disease. There is well established evidence that PVs are disease-causing, and LPVs are strongly suspected but have less definitive evidence. Both are considered positive results in genetic testing indicating a diagnostic result. When TP53 PVs/LPVs are identified in a comprehensive germline panel, this raises concern for Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). However, delineation of the origin of the TP53 PV/LPV is necessary because detection of the TP53 PV/LPV can occur through multiple mechanisms, including clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), mosaicism, or a true germline finding. She elected to proceed with bilateral skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy with left axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) and Magtrace injection (Endomag; A Hologic Company) into the right breast for delayed SLNB. Neurotization of flaps was performed with a nerve graft from the fourth and fifth intercostal nerves to the nipple–areolar complex and placement of prepectoral tissue expanders. She recovered well after surgery, and the final pathology revealed right breast DCIS, no residual left breast DCIS, and a malignant phyllodes tumor excised to negative margins. Left SLNB was negative, and axillary lymph node dissection was not required. Initial biopsies demonstrated bilateral high-grade DCIS, both of which were ER-positive (90%–95%; strong). A separate biopsy of a left breast mass revealed a malignant fibroepithelial lesion containing a benign epithelial component and a high-grade malignant spindle cell component with lipoblastic differentiation. The spindle cell component was positive for CD34 and SMA (smooth muscle actin) and was negative for numerous cytokeratin stains and p63. Moreover, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was negative for amplification of MDNW (mouse double minute 2 homolog), excluding a dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Bilateral mastectomies were performed, and 22 mm of DCIS was found in the right breast, whereas the left breast contained a small (5.6 mm) malignant phyllodes tumor with lipoblastic differentiation; no residual DCIS was identified in the left breast (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3). The left breast mass biopsy contained a fibroepithelial lesion with overtly malignant, high-grade spindle cells and a benign epithelial component. Lipoblastic differentiation is present in the bottom right of the biopsy. The left mastectomy specimen contained a small (5.6 mm), malignant phyllodes tumor with lipoblastic differentiation, which was remote from ductal carcinoma in situ. Numerous ducts containing high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, solid pattern, were identified in the right mastectomy specimen. Several years before presentation, the patient was diagnosed with a large left breast cyst and underwent excision. After that, she was recommended by her gynecologist to undergo annual mammographic screening alternating with whole-breast ultrasound in the setting of fibrocystic changes and dense breasts. Thus the patient began annual mammography screening before age 40 years and had four prior normal mammograms, with normal imaging 1 year before diagnosis. Of note, she did not undergo high-risk MRI screening, which would have been recommended annually starting at ages 25–30 years had her high-risk status been known.2 In patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer, contrast-enhanced breast MRI is appropriate to evaluate for locoregional disease and can accurately assess tumor size and detect additional cancers in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast.3 The screening guidelines for breast disease depend on risk, and high-risk includes patients with genetic-based increased risk, those with a calculated lifetime risk of breast cancer ≥20%, and those exposed to chest radiation at young ages. Patients with genetic-based increased risk of breast cancer, annual breast MRI is recommended.1 If performed, such patients can delay mammographic screening until age 40 years rather than starting earlier than those with average risk. All women should undergo breast cancer risk assessment by age 25 years so that those at high risk can be identified and appropriate screening can be initiated earlier than age 40 years when appropriate.2 Her mammogram showed new calcifications in both breasts (Figure 4) and dense breast tissue, which limits the sensitivity of mammography.4 (A) Right and (B) left mediolateral oblique screening mammogram images and (C) right and (D) left craniocaudal screening mammogram images show extremely dense breast tissue and grouped calcifications in the right breast at 5 o'clock, posterior depth, and in the left breast at 12 o'clock, posterior depth (arrows). (E) Right craniocaudal magnification view also shows the right breast calcifications, which measure up to 7 mm (arrow). (F) Left craniocaudal magnification view also show the left breast calcifications, which measure up to 19 mm (arrow). Bilateral stereotactic biopsies with clip placement were performed. (G) Maximum-intensity projection image from a subsequent contrast-enhanced MRI shows minimal enhancement at the biopsy sites and a separate, 1.0-cm, irregular, enhancing mass in the left breast at 10 o'clock far posterior depth (arrow), which had suspicious washout enhancement kinetics. (H) A subsequent MRI-directed, targeted ultrasound showed a 0.8-cm mass at 10 o'clock, posterior depth, corresponding to the MRI finding (arrow). Ultrasound-guided biopsy with clip placement was performed. Subsequent whole-body MRI was performed without contrast and revealed no other suspicious findings. MRI indicates magnetic resonance of breast cancers can be to breast cancer are and have in Diagnostic of can be a of with breast cancer a of a such significant family history of cancer, breast cancer, or breast cancer, diagnostic 7 in testing in patients with breast cancer in of and In to germline or germline TP53 is a of breast evaluation and testing are of the for breast cancer because the results can diagnosed with a germline TP53 PV/LPV have is a cancer syndrome that is associated with increased risk for multiple but not breast cancer, and carcinoma. Of note, in the of variants can cancer risk variants that have a have a cancer risk, and variants are in variants or variants with a are found in with diagnosis in an with diagnosed breast cancer includes of bilateral to surgery, which is is because of the risk of and an to that risk the need for which can be associated with for those diagnosed with are it is to to those diagnosed with and at increased risk for cancer, in this genetic in the of is performed on or because the DNA from is considered of the However, in the of of results can be because the testing be of a true germline present in cells in the but also be to a mosaicism, clonal or in origin to tumor DNA that can be in with The from to an that is from small of that to be a image at a but on In the of is the of of cells in an is by a in the DNA in additional cell in an The is on of that cells Of note, changes in DNA are not in that there are 1 changes to variants variants are not associated with disease the variants for benign or likely benign in a of the in a in a of a type 1 or syndrome are in which there are skin findings in areas of the can in or or in which the can have than syndrome and to and in a an is has a variant identified in an of the this PV/LPV is that there is a increased risk risk in because of the risk for mosaicism, which is to the or risk, is with the risk of the disease disease has associated risk, have a risk well There is no to concern for a cancer syndrome until a cancer is because are without on it is in to an increased risk in the that the PV/LPV and increased it is also to that it also a risk of to the tissue the has been that clonal hematopoiesis is of a in of is the of of and cells and is associated with increased risk for and The TP53 is of the associated with The of with tobacco and to or an has a TP53 PV/LPV in a it is to germline clonal and tumor DNA to and TP53 PVs/LPVs are considered and and hematopoiesis and tumor DNA to not an increased risk for or other and not the for based on findings. There are multiple that can be to the of the TP53 PV/LPV testing of can a family also the TP53 then germline origin is In DNA without cells, such skin can be If a skin biopsy of cells results in the detection of a TP53 then the germline is If the skin biopsy is negative for the TP53 then clonal hematopoiesis or should be In to risk for the a germline TP53 PV/LPV has a for other family The testing of family can in diagnosis of and can be which in earlier cancer and can also be the is an to such in with genetic diagnosis. genetic diagnosis in to by a cells from an testing for the known TP53 PV/LPV can be can be for the risk of on the and that are not with MRI was recommended guidelines the of other cancers in a patient with concern for MRI was for bilateral breast and the including an indeterminate lesion up to There was no other evidence of ultrasound showed an and a posterior testing of the family was completed because it is a and to a germline TP53 If of her was to the TP53 her diagnosis of would be because she the TP53 from that testing was and a diagnosis of was not with this testing because the results were negative in both Given the negative an to an diagnosis is to the finding in an If the TP53 is in tissue, this would be diagnostic for because it would a germline finding or cells with the both of which are The to this is by skin biopsy. A skin biopsy was completed on the posterior which also was negative for the TP53 for this patient were because she was through the of in and genetic diagnosis. Given the concern for in the patient and the known TP53 testing of the was were of the positive for the known maternal TP53 The negative and negative results were findings for the potential and her her of bilateral DCIS and phyllodes tumor and with the TP53 there was for the for the TP53 Thus was that the patient had germline that were then testing of the three breast would that the TP53 of in the patient was not then of the three would have pathogenic variants because the of of the three the variant is that tumor the testing was completed for three The TP53 was in three testing of the tumor cells or DNA The variant is an of that is reported on tumor The the of the cells the that the variant of it can be in the of tumor in tumor but it can also into potential germline findings. A high is of a germline because a germline for a should have an of of the are the and the A when includes that there can be a of in this and it is not a for germline status, but it can be a that should be a to a germline from the testing is in this to the to evidence in of the germline finding. In the for the TP53 in lesion was left breast DCIS, right breast DCIS, and left phyllodes tumor, The of the in tumor the of this variant in that If the testing was completed before the germline test, the high in the right breast DCIS and the left phyllodes tumor should have the of a germline The evidence of the testing and the is with in patient and is diagnostic for Thus she the for Her are with and not need The of is small because this to be mosaicism, but it is to the testing for her to that this is The tissue to be at the The patient is in the of she would to proceed with family in with a genetic diagnosis in the of a for DCIS for of diagnosed breast cancer, and the of is The is for to in high-risk patients 10 years, with a breast of at 10 years of the type of breast is recommended for DCIS because of the risk of to invasive cancer and the risk of to invasive However, which patients with DCIS to invasive cancer is not well There is an in a of patients for active be from the National Cancer and that the risk of ipsilateral cancer is year with active for such and Network have criteria and are this for patients with did not patient was a for active because of her young high-grade tumor, bilateral breast cancer, and malignant phyllodes The breast cancer risk for women with TP53 is with breast cancers at a younger cancers are also associated with of ipsilateral breast cancer with surgery, of contralateral breast cancer, and of and in who have breast cancer with other who have breast malignant phyllodes breast in women are associated with The risk of a cancer 10 years of diagnosis is high to the for mastectomy in radiation is recommended after for DCIS and the risk of by The patients with DCIS to with or without radiation and that the risk of at years was after radiation and without radiation and the risk of invasive locoregional disease was and However, patient did not criteria for DCIS 3, young and radiation is not recommended in patients with because of to is recommended rather than with has been demonstrated that of the complex at the of mastectomy with is from an there is a of after and the of can be In a by with the the was at 1 40% were with with the of an in The of in the breast and the of The nerves to the through the breast and are the to and In a by patients mastectomy had a of breast and of breast with those The of is to this well to in the breast, which is reported in of has been by of the nerve of the A by in demonstrated the of the nerves and for the of a for nerve The intercostal nerve can be identified the fourth 2 of the A by identified the and of the fourth intercostal nerve of the of the breast skin and The of the fourth intercostal nerve is the nerve to the complex 95% The of has been well in but and and were the to the of a the fourth intercostal nerve and the In of women mastectomy with and nerve and there was an of demonstrated in skin and but with with There is an of the that would for which results in of and patient SLNB is recommended for patients with DCIS who are In a from The of Cancer patients for DCIS, or invasive cancer was identified in and was likely to occur in younger those with high-grade DCIS, those with a DCIS size and those who had DCIS diagnosed on biopsy. The of a positive lymph node in patients with DCIS was the of a In a from The of Cancer of patients mastectomy with SLNB for DCIS, there was an to or invasive cancer in and of patients had positive Of had tumor cells in the had and had The of on diagnosis by DCIS and multiple before SLNB were associated with positive SLNB in that in of patients for DCIS, DCIS was to invasive cancer in of and of patients mastectomy for DCIS had a positive In view of the of there is to SLNB it would not the for the associated with the of a SLNB a risk of a risk of and a risk of and axillary syndrome of and in of of patients were by a the after In the the reported was and the of was in the National Breast and the of changes with SLNB at was and and at were reported by and In a and demonstrated that of women who underwent SLNB had from this with of those who did not undergo SLNB SLNB was associated with the of and is not in view of the of lymph node in has been demonstrated that the of is for of the node with the with or without The the of delayed an with a and of the at a In this is into the breast at the of the breast for invasive cancer was identified breast SLNB was performed the biopsy was performed a of from the surgery, injection of and on the of SLNB. The patients with DCIS with DCIS grade 2 with size grade DCIS, or with In patients with invasive breast cancer who subsequently underwent was to the detection of with and The detection with was than that with and had a of of patients in this were to SLNB because had DCIS or were than years with an invasive ductal breast cancer or on final pathology because would not and the was results have been in other for patients mastectomy for DCIS or a genetic a delayed SLNB patients from the and subsequent and an in for DCIS and invasive breast for DCIS is If is for DCIS radiation for and of Cancer the and DCIS and this was by the Breast Cancer have demonstrated a of radiation in with have also demonstrated that radiation after the risk of by for both invasive and breast have demonstrated no on breast or in radiation it is to the potential of phyllodes tumor, radiation is also considered for after in patients to the risk of of this In that TP53 PVs/LPVs are associated with increased has been demonstrated that patients with who radiation have an increased risk of The reported risk of from to in the this that the of radiation are recommended in the of In the diagnosis of to a in for the of her DCIS and phyllodes After the detection of a TP53 diagnostic for bilateral mastectomy was and she was to DCIS is a breast cancer by and DCIS is a to invasive breast cancer, which when malignant epithelial cells of the and the DCIS for of diagnosed breast and of are diagnosed with screening mammography in in from to 10 of DCIS to invasive breast cancer, and the is in have on a multidisciplinary that has for the of to also breast cancer In of with the of ER and a in for both invasive breast cancer and DCIS, because than of DCIS the ER Several have women who underwent with and without The with for 5 At to a in new breast cancer with analysis that this was to ER-positive that should be considered for patients with from the identified a in breast cancer with additional have demonstrated findings. In a National Health the for did not which the that for DCIS a in and not are fibroepithelial breast that for of breast present well breast are or phyllodes for of malignant, the tumor have increased and the of that can or also malignant phyllodes and the of are associated with increased risk of and The for phyllodes tumor is excision. and phyllodes can be with based on a risk of or is for benign phyllodes the risk of and disease for and malignant phyllodes with negative is also an are associated with increased in malignant phyllodes tumor, and is is not because of the risk of lymph node There is the of radiation for malignant phyllodes the risk of in the of but not is not in because of a of there are so locoregional is have been associated with germline and In a of patients with phyllodes who underwent germline genetic testing for had a which can with of PV/LPV can be in malignant phyllodes tumor, and genetic evaluation should be In genetic testing was breast cancer to of on the of pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation in her breast her tumor was a malignant phyllodes was mastectomy with negative margins. Given her TP53 which is diagnostic for radiation was not and she be with is associated with increased risk of including breast, skin and tissue, and well and Given this for cancer in both and screening has the of with the and of All patients with should have a comprehensive a of Breast cancer and screening should by age years, with and breast for patients with should be by breast starting at age for annual screening breast MRI for women ages and patients with who are than years, of should be considered on an can be considered MRI is the of increased radiation associated with is In of bilateral mastectomy is in this and cancer includes a screening and colonoscopy years starting at age 25 cancer should at age 50 years with annual contrast-enhanced resonance carcinoma should until at age 40 should annually at age including and should also to for and Given the increased risk for and the increased risk for annual whole-body MRI are an component of brain MRI should also be considered the risk for If whole-body MRI is an comprehensive imaging of the is There are additional for and in the which not be Moreover, it should be that based on and history of this be into and be In the and of this diagnosis should be In the of comprehensive is and complex for who have with the of detection of and She is the of in which additional of for testing for TP53 LPVs in her There is no for or in a patient after bilateral mastectomies and had fibrocystic tissue and no high-risk genetic status was to have been referred for breast imaging prior to the recommended age had no that had breast cancer, that was to it and to other of was in additional through subsequent testing to for and other cancer genetic results the from of breast tissue to of associated with radiation it to the of a bilateral mastectomy positive and to for prepectoral placement of to additional tissue and also breast for preservation. results of family the TP53 there are for both and potential the earlier can the to to to for the TP53 the findings have been at the is genetic testing been performed also have and would not have left cancer up to no additional with and to In young it is to a history and assess for genetic risk for cancer testing genetic in patients with diagnosed breast cancer before or which can the of multiple in the of patients who have breast cancer and the of of those evaluation of genetic testing results was a component of this genetic assessment because of the of this that, when a TP53 PV/LPV is through germline it is to the origin of that before based on the result. The for with are was because the was not that the TP53 was germline by testing of the is the of the of the and of the of three breast cancers in a woman years with a TP53 negative and a negative skin biopsy that for a of the to the assessment of tissue to and to that the of multiple areas was testing three breast Of note, the tumor to multiple with the TP53 to the diagnosis was of the for the tumor testing in testing was by the multiple and was not and multiple the for the the completed the tumor testing for three which was in of In assessment and multidisciplinary of of breast with and assessment of genetic findings to a for and the and with a of of for this from the from and for other from and the The no of

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.70034
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer found to have mosaic TP53 likely pathogenic variant

Melissa D. Adams, Jesse Hart, Lauren Massingham, Elizabeth H. Dibble et al.
CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

A patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer found to have mosaic TP53 likely pathogenic variant

Melissa D. Adams, Jesse Hart, Lauren Massingham, Elizabeth H. Dibble, Hetal Mistry, Mary Anne Fenton, K.L. Leonard, Galina Lagos, Charu Taneja
article en

Abstract

A 36-year-old, nulligravid woman with a history of controlled eosinophilic esophagitis, asthma, and dense fibrocystic breasts was referred to the Breast Health Center after abnormal screening mammography. She reported recent fatigue and intermittent diarrhea but had a negative colonoscopy and food allergy testing this year. Her family history was significant for a maternal grandmother with a question of uterine cancer, a maternal grandfather who died of renal cancer at age 62 years, a paternal grandmother who died of brain cancer at age 56 years, a paternal grandfather who died of brain cancer at age 80 years, and a history of premalignant changes in the esophagus in her father. She has never smoked tobacco and consumes zero to three drinks of alcohol weekly. She has been physically active in multiple sports, including biking and swimming, and played the cello. Mammography demonstrated extremely dense breast tissue with new calcifications in both breasts. Diagnostic mammography demonstrated indeterminate grouped calcifications spanning 19 mm in the right breast at 5 o'clock and 7 mm in the left breast 12 o'clock. She subsequently underwent stereotactic needle biopsies of both areas, which revealed right breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), nuclear grade 3, with 90% estrogen receptor (ER) expression; and left ductal carcinoma, nuclear grade 3, with 95% ER expression, 40% progesterone receptor (PR) expression, negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status, and a Ki-67 index of 40%. Within the left breast biopsy there was an absence of myoepithelial cells, raising concern that the findings reflected an unusual type of invasive carcinoma. She then underwent bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which revealed the known areas of DCIS in the bilateral breasts and also revealed a 1.0-cm mass inferior to the left breast DCIS at 12 o'clock that was considered suspicious. On subsequent ultrasound, it corresponded to an 8-mm mass in the left breast at 10 o'clock. A biopsy of the mass demonstrated a spindle cell tumor, favoring malignant phyllodes tumor with pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation that was negative for ER, PR, and HER2 (triple-negative), with a Ki-67 index of 30%. At her multidisciplinary consultation, she was referred for genetic evaluation having met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria based on her diagnosis of breast cancer when younger than 50 years.1 Given the concern for invasive left breast cancer and possible need for chemotherapy, she was also referred for fertility preservation. She completed a comprehensive 76-gene germline genetic test, which revealed tumor protein p53 (TP53) likely pathogenic variant (LPV; c.716A>G; p.N239S). Pathogenic variants (PVs) and LPVs are DNA sequence changes that are associated with increased risk of disease. There is well established evidence that PVs are disease-causing, and LPVs are strongly suspected but have less definitive evidence. Both are considered positive results in genetic testing indicating a diagnostic result. When TP53 PVs/LPVs are identified in a comprehensive germline panel, this raises concern for Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). However, delineation of the origin of the TP53 PV/LPV is necessary because detection of the TP53 PV/LPV can occur through multiple mechanisms, including clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), mosaicism, or a true germline finding. She elected to proceed with bilateral skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy with left axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) and Magtrace injection (Endomag; A Hologic Company) into the right breast for delayed SLNB. Neurotization of flaps was performed with a nerve graft from the fourth and fifth intercostal nerves to the nipple–areolar complex and placement of prepectoral tissue expanders. She recovered well after surgery, and the final pathology revealed right breast DCIS, no residual left breast DCIS, and a malignant phyllodes tumor excised to negative margins. Left SLNB was negative, and axillary lymph node dissection was not required. Initial biopsies demonstrated bilateral high-grade DCIS, both of which were ER-positive (90%–95%; strong). A separate biopsy of a left breast mass revealed a malignant fibroepithelial lesion containing a benign epithelial component and a high-grade malignant spindle cell component with lipoblastic differentiation. The spindle cell component was positive for CD34 and SMA (smooth muscle actin) and was negative for numerous cytokeratin stains and p63. Moreover, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was negative for amplification of MDNW (mouse double minute 2 homolog), excluding a dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Bilateral mastectomies were performed, and 22 mm of DCIS was found in the right breast, whereas the left breast contained a small (5.6 mm) malignant phyllodes tumor with lipoblastic differentiation; no residual DCIS was identified in the left breast (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3). The left breast mass biopsy contained a fibroepithelial lesion with overtly malignant, high-grade spindle cells and a benign epithelial component. Lipoblastic differentiation is present in the bottom right of the biopsy. The left mastectomy specimen contained a small (5.6 mm), malignant phyllodes tumor with lipoblastic differentiation, which was remote from ductal carcinoma in situ. Numerous ducts containing high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, solid pattern, were identified in the right mastectomy specimen. Several years before presentation, the patient was diagnosed with a large left breast cyst and underwent excision. After that, she was recommended by her gynecologist to undergo annual mammographic screening alternating with whole-breast ultrasound in the setting of fibrocystic changes and dense breasts. Thus the patient began annual mammography screening before age 40 years and had four prior normal mammograms, with normal imaging 1 year before diagnosis. Of note, she did not undergo high-risk MRI screening, which would have been recommended annually starting at ages 25–30 years had her high-risk status been known.2 In patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer, contrast-enhanced breast MRI is appropriate to evaluate for locoregional disease and can accurately assess tumor size and detect additional cancers in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast.3 The screening guidelines for breast disease depend on risk, and high-risk includes patients with genetic-based increased risk, those with a calculated lifetime risk of breast cancer ≥20%, and those exposed to chest radiation at young ages. Patients with genetic-based increased risk of breast cancer, annual breast MRI is recommended.1 If performed, such patients can delay mammographic screening until age 40 years rather than starting earlier than those with average risk. All women should undergo breast cancer risk assessment by age 25 years so that those at high risk can be identified and appropriate screening can be initiated earlier than age 40 years when appropriate.2 Her mammogram showed new calcifications in both breasts (Figure 4) and dense breast tissue, which limits the sensitivity of mammography.4 (A) Right and (B) left mediolateral oblique screening mammogram images and (C) right and (D) left craniocaudal screening mammogram images show extremely dense breast tissue and grouped calcifications in the right breast at 5 o'clock, posterior depth, and in the left breast at 12 o'clock, posterior depth (arrows). (E) Right craniocaudal magnification view also shows the right breast calcifications, which measure up to 7 mm (arrow). (F) Left craniocaudal magnification view also show the left breast calcifications, which measure up to 19 mm (arrow). Bilateral stereotactic biopsies with clip placement were performed. (G) Maximum-intensity projection image from a subsequent contrast-enhanced MRI shows minimal enhancement at the biopsy sites and a separate, 1.0-cm, irregular, enhancing mass in the left breast at 10 o'clock far posterior depth (arrow), which had suspicious washout enhancement kinetics. (H) A subsequent MRI-directed, targeted ultrasound showed a 0.8-cm mass at 10 o'clock, posterior depth, corresponding to the MRI finding (arrow). Ultrasound-guided biopsy with clip placement was performed. Subsequent whole-body MRI was performed without contrast and revealed no other suspicious findings. MRI indicates magnetic resonance of breast cancers can be to breast cancer are and have in Diagnostic of can be a of with breast cancer a of a such significant family history of cancer, breast cancer, or breast cancer, diagnostic 7 in testing in patients with breast cancer in of and In to germline or germline TP53 is a of breast evaluation and testing are of the for breast cancer because the results can diagnosed with a germline TP53 PV/LPV have is a cancer syndrome that is associated with increased risk for multiple but not breast cancer, and carcinoma. Of note, in the of variants can cancer risk variants that have a have a cancer risk, and variants are in variants or variants with a are found in with diagnosis in an with diagnosed breast cancer includes of bilateral to surgery, which is is because of the risk of and an to that risk the need for which can be associated with for those diagnosed with are it is to to those diagnosed with and at increased risk for cancer, in this genetic in the of is performed on or because the DNA from is considered of the However, in the of of results can be because the testing be of a true germline present in cells in the but also be to a mosaicism, clonal or in origin to tumor DNA that can be in with The from to an that is from small of that to be a image at a but on In the of is the of of cells in an is by a in the DNA in additional cell in an The is on of that cells Of note, changes in DNA are not in that there are 1 changes to variants variants are not associated with disease the variants for benign or likely benign in a of the in a in a of a type 1 or syndrome are in which there are skin findings in areas of the can in or or in which the can have than syndrome and to and in a an is has a variant identified in an of the this PV/LPV is that there is a increased risk risk in because of the risk for mosaicism, which is to the or risk, is with the risk of the disease disease has associated risk, have a risk well There is no to concern for a cancer syndrome until a cancer is because are without on it is in to an increased risk in the that the PV/LPV and increased it is also to that it also a risk of to the tissue the has been that clonal hematopoiesis is of a in of is the of of and cells and is associated with increased risk for and The TP53 is of the associated with The of with tobacco and to or an has a TP53 PV/LPV in a it is to germline clonal and tumor DNA to and TP53 PVs/LPVs are considered and and hematopoiesis and tumor DNA to not an increased risk for or other and not the for based on findings. There are multiple that can be to the of the TP53 PV/LPV testing of can a family also the TP53 then germline origin is In DNA without cells, such skin can be If a skin biopsy of cells results in the detection of a TP53 then the germline is If the skin biopsy is negative for the TP53 then clonal hematopoiesis or should be In to risk for the a germline TP53 PV/LPV has a for other family The testing of family can in diagnosis of and can be which in earlier cancer and can also be the is an to such in with genetic diagnosis. genetic diagnosis in to by a cells from an testing for the known TP53 PV/LPV can be can be for the risk of on the and that are not with MRI was recommended guidelines the of other cancers in a patient with concern for MRI was for bilateral breast and the including an indeterminate lesion up to There was no other evidence of ultrasound showed an and a posterior testing of the family was completed because it is a and to a germline TP53 If of her was to the TP53 her diagnosis of would be because she the TP53 from that testing was and a diagnosis of was not with this testing because the results were negative in both Given the negative an to an diagnosis is to the finding in an If the TP53 is in tissue, this would be diagnostic for because it would a germline finding or cells with the both of which are The to this is by skin biopsy. A skin biopsy was completed on the posterior which also was negative for the TP53 for this patient were because she was through the of in and genetic diagnosis. Given the concern for in the patient and the known TP53 testing of the was were of the positive for the known maternal TP53 The negative and negative results were findings for the potential and her her of bilateral DCIS and phyllodes tumor and with the TP53 there was for the for the TP53 Thus was that the patient had germline that were then testing of the three breast would that the TP53 of in the patient was not then of the three would have pathogenic variants because the of of the three the variant is that tumor the testing was completed for three The TP53 was in three testing of the tumor cells or DNA The variant is an of that is reported on tumor The the of the cells the that the variant of it can be in the of tumor in tumor but it can also into potential germline findings. A high is of a germline because a germline for a should have an of of the are the and the A when includes that there can be a of in this and it is not a for germline status, but it can be a that should be a to a germline from the testing is in this to the to evidence in of the germline finding. In the for the TP53 in lesion was left breast DCIS, right breast DCIS, and left phyllodes tumor, The of the in tumor the of this variant in that If the testing was completed before the germline test, the high in the right breast DCIS and the left phyllodes tumor should have the of a germline The evidence of the testing and the is with in patient and is diagnostic for Thus she the for Her are with and not need The of is small because this to be mosaicism, but it is to the testing for her to that this is The tissue to be at the The patient is in the of she would to proceed with family in with a genetic diagnosis in the of a for DCIS for of diagnosed breast cancer, and the of is The is for to in high-risk patients 10 years, with a breast of at 10 years of the type of breast is recommended for DCIS because of the risk of to invasive cancer and the risk of to invasive However, which patients with DCIS to invasive cancer is not well There is an in a of patients for active be from the National Cancer and that the risk of ipsilateral cancer is year with active for such and Network have criteria and are this for patients with did not patient was a for active because of her young high-grade tumor, bilateral breast cancer, and malignant phyllodes The breast cancer risk for women with TP53 is with breast cancers at a younger cancers are also associated with of ipsilateral breast cancer with surgery, of contralateral breast cancer, and of and in who have breast cancer with other who have breast malignant phyllodes breast in women are associated with The risk of a cancer 10 years of diagnosis is high to the for mastectomy in radiation is recommended after for DCIS and the risk of by The patients with DCIS to with or without radiation and that the risk of at years was after radiation and without radiation and the risk of invasive locoregional disease was and However, patient did not criteria for DCIS 3, young and radiation is not recommended in patients with because of to is recommended rather than with has been demonstrated that of the complex at the of mastectomy with is from an there is a of after and the of can be In a by with the the was at 1 40% were with with the of an in The of in the breast and the of The nerves to the through the breast and are the to and In a by patients mastectomy had a of breast and of breast with those The of is to this well to in the breast, which is reported in of has been by of the nerve of the A by in demonstrated the of the nerves and for the of a for nerve The intercostal nerve can be identified the fourth 2 of the A by identified the and of the fourth intercostal nerve of the of the breast skin and The of the fourth intercostal nerve is the nerve to the complex 95% The of has been well in but and and were the to the of a the fourth intercostal nerve and the In of women mastectomy with and nerve and there was an of demonstrated in skin and but with with There is an of the that would for which results in of and patient SLNB is recommended for patients with DCIS who are In a from The of Cancer patients for DCIS, or invasive cancer was identified in and was likely to occur in younger those with high-grade DCIS, those with a DCIS size and those who had DCIS diagnosed on biopsy. The of a positive lymph node in patients with DCIS was the of a In a from The of Cancer of patients mastectomy with SLNB for DCIS, there was an to or invasive cancer in and of patients had positive Of had tumor cells in the had and had The of on diagnosis by DCIS and multiple before SLNB were associated with positive SLNB in that in of patients for DCIS, DCIS was to invasive cancer in of and of patients mastectomy for DCIS had a positive In view of the of there is to SLNB it would not the for the associated with the of a SLNB a risk of a risk of and a risk of and axillary syndrome of and in of of patients were by a the after In the the reported was and the of was in the National Breast and the of changes with SLNB at was and and at were reported by and In a and demonstrated that of women who underwent SLNB had from this with of those who did not undergo SLNB SLNB was associated with the of and is not in view of the of lymph node in has been demonstrated that the of is for of the node with the with or without The the of delayed an with a and of the at a In this is into the breast at the of the breast for invasive cancer was identified breast SLNB was performed the biopsy was performed a of from the surgery, injection of and on the of SLNB. The patients with DCIS with DCIS grade 2 with size grade DCIS, or with In patients with invasive breast cancer who subsequently underwent was to the detection of with and The detection with was than that with and had a of of patients in this were to SLNB because had DCIS or were than years with an invasive ductal breast cancer or on final pathology because would not and the was results have been in other for patients mastectomy for DCIS or a genetic a delayed SLNB patients from the and subsequent and an in for DCIS and invasive breast for DCIS is If is for DCIS radiation for and of Cancer the and DCIS and this was by the Breast Cancer have demonstrated a of radiation in with have also demonstrated that radiation after the risk of by for both invasive and breast have demonstrated no on breast or in radiation it is to the potential of phyllodes tumor, radiation is also considered for after in patients to the risk of of this In that TP53 PVs/LPVs are associated with increased has been demonstrated that patients with who radiation have an increased risk of The reported risk of from to in the this that the of radiation are recommended in the of In the diagnosis of to a in for the of her DCIS and phyllodes After the detection of a TP53 diagnostic for bilateral mastectomy was and she was to DCIS is a breast cancer by and DCIS is a to invasive breast cancer, which when malignant epithelial cells of the and the DCIS for of diagnosed breast and of are diagnosed with screening mammography in in from to 10 of DCIS to invasive breast cancer, and the is in have on a multidisciplinary that has for the of to also breast cancer In of with the of ER and a in for both invasive breast cancer and DCIS, because than of DCIS the ER Several have women who underwent with and without The with for 5 At to a in new breast cancer with analysis that this was to ER-positive that should be considered for patients with from the identified a in breast cancer with additional have demonstrated findings. In a National Health the for did not which the that for DCIS a in and not are fibroepithelial breast that for of breast present well breast are or phyllodes for of malignant, the tumor have increased and the of that can or also malignant phyllodes and the of are associated with increased risk of and The for phyllodes tumor is excision. and phyllodes can be with based on a risk of or is for benign phyllodes the risk of and disease for and malignant phyllodes with negative is also an are associated with increased in malignant phyllodes tumor, and is is not because of the risk of lymph node There is the of radiation for malignant phyllodes the risk of in the of but not is not in because of a of there are so locoregional is have been associated with germline and In a of patients with phyllodes who underwent germline genetic testing for had a which can with of PV/LPV can be in malignant phyllodes tumor, and genetic evaluation should be In genetic testing was breast cancer to of on the of pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation in her breast her tumor was a malignant phyllodes was mastectomy with negative margins. Given her TP53 which is diagnostic for radiation was not and she be with is associated with increased risk of including breast, skin and tissue, and well and Given this for cancer in both and screening has the of with the and of All patients with should have a comprehensive a of Breast cancer and screening should by age years, with and breast for patients with should be by breast starting at age for annual screening breast MRI for women ages and patients with who are than years, of should be considered on an can be considered MRI is the of increased radiation associated with is In of bilateral mastectomy is in this and cancer includes a screening and colonoscopy years starting at age 25 cancer should at age 50 years with annual contrast-enhanced resonance carcinoma should until at age 40 should annually at age including and should also to for and Given the increased risk for and the increased risk for annual whole-body MRI are an component of brain MRI should also be considered the risk for If whole-body MRI is an comprehensive imaging of the is There are additional for and in the which not be Moreover, it should be that based on and history of this be into and be In the and of this diagnosis should be In the of comprehensive is and complex for who have with the of detection of and She is the of in which additional of for testing for TP53 LPVs in her There is no for or in a patient after bilateral mastectomies and had fibrocystic tissue and no high-risk genetic status was to have been referred for breast imaging prior to the recommended age had no that had breast cancer, that was to it and to other of was in additional through subsequent testing to for and other cancer genetic results the from of breast tissue to of associated with radiation it to the of a bilateral mastectomy positive and to for prepectoral placement of to additional tissue and also breast for preservation. results of family the TP53 there are for both and potential the earlier can the to to to for the TP53 the findings have been at the is genetic testing been performed also have and would not have left cancer up to no additional with and to In young it is to a history and assess for genetic risk for cancer testing genetic in patients with diagnosed breast cancer before or which can the of multiple in the of patients who have breast cancer and the of of those evaluation of genetic testing results was a component of this genetic assessment because of the of this that, when a TP53 PV/LPV is through germline it is to the origin of that before based on the result. The for with are was because the was not that the TP53 was germline by testing of the is the of the of the and of the of three breast cancers in a woman years with a TP53 negative and a negative skin biopsy that for a of the to the assessment of tissue to and to that the of multiple areas was testing three breast Of note, the tumor to multiple with the TP53 to the diagnosis was of the for the tumor testing in testing was by the multiple and was not and multiple the for the the completed the tumor testing for three which was in of In assessment and multidisciplinary of of breast with and assessment of genetic findings to a for and the and with a of of for this from the from and for other from and the The no of

CA A Cancer Journal for CliniciansVol. 76(1)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.