An Algorithmic Comparison for Robust ADHD Classification on Imbalanced National Health Survey Data

Machine learning offers a promising avenue for improving the diagnostic classification of neurodevelopmental disorders, yet performance is often hindered by the class imbalance inherent in large-scale health datasets. This study presents an algorithmic comparison of Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop a robust classification model for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using imbalanced data from the 2023 National Survey of Children’s Health (N=54,749). The primary objective was to evaluate algorithmic performance under various data resampling conditions. A Random Undersampling (RUS) technique was applied at multiple ratios to mitigate class imbalance. Models were systematically evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results demonstrate that while both algorithms achieved high accuracy, XGBoost consistently outperformed RF in balancing precision and recall, particularly on undersampled data. The optimal model was an XGBoost classifier trained on a dataset with a 0.3 undersampling ratio, which achieved a peak F1-score of 84% and an accuracy of 93%. Feature importance analysis confirmed that variables related to special health care needs, medication use, and behavioral diagnoses were the most significant predictors. This research concludes that XGBoost, when combined with moderate undersampling, provides a superior and more robust framework for ADHD classification in imbalanced real-world datasets, highlighting its potential as a tool for clinical decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit65724.2025.11167680
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Algorithmic Comparison for Robust ADHD Classification on Imbalanced National Health Survey Data

Kiki Ferawati, Respatiwulan Respatiwulan, Hasih Pratiwi, Yuliana Susanti et al.
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

An Algorithmic Comparison for Robust ADHD Classification on Imbalanced National Health Survey Data

Kiki Ferawati, Respatiwulan Respatiwulan, Hasih Pratiwi, Yuliana Susanti, Sri Sulistijowati Handajani, Laila Dyah Kusuma Ramadhani
article en

Abstract

Machine learning offers a promising avenue for improving the diagnostic classification of neurodevelopmental disorders, yet performance is often hindered by the class imbalance inherent in large-scale health datasets. This study presents an algorithmic comparison of Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop a robust classification model for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using imbalanced data from the 2023 National Survey of Children’s Health (N=54,749). The primary objective was to evaluate algorithmic performance under various data resampling conditions. A Random Undersampling (RUS) technique was applied at multiple ratios to mitigate class imbalance. Models were systematically evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results demonstrate that while both algorithms achieved high accuracy, XGBoost consistently outperformed RF in balancing precision and recall, particularly on undersampled data. The optimal model was an XGBoost classifier trained on a dataset with a 0.3 undersampling ratio, which achieved a peak F1-score of 84% and an accuracy of 93%. Feature importance analysis confirmed that variables related to special health care needs, medication use, and behavioral diagnoses were the most significant predictors. This research concludes that XGBoost, when combined with moderate undersampling, provides a superior and more robust framework for ADHD classification in imbalanced real-world datasets, highlighting its potential as a tool for clinical decision support.

Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.