Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Brain Tumor Identification in MRI Data

Patient outcomes depend on the ability to identify brain tumors from MRI images. Using the BraTS Africa dataset, this study examines a hybrid approach that combines deep learning and classical machine learning for the purpose of segmenting and classifying tumor regions from brain MRI images. Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are the five common algorithms that were compared. A preprocessing pipeline emphasized the edges of tumors and enhanced image quality. It featured Otsu and adaptive thresholding, contrast stretching, erosion and dilation morphological operations, Sobel and Laplacian edge detection, greyscale normalization, and histogram equalization. To further enhance feature extraction, advanced methods such as watershed segmentation and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) were applied. CNNs outperformed Random Forest classifiers, achieving an accuracy of 82.86% and F1-score of 0.81, compared to Random Forest’s accuracy of 77.14% and F1-score of 0.79. The study frames the classification problem as a binary diagnostic task, aiming to algorithmically differentiate between pathological (tumor) and non-pathological (healthy) brain regions in MRI imagery. KNN and Logistic Regression yielded lower accuracies of 51.43% and 60%, respectively, underscoring the enhanced discriminative power of modern AI architectures in neuroimaging diagnostics. The proposed hybrid framework demonstrates the efficacy of integrating advanced preprocessing with model-specific strengths to optimize tumor detection. Personalized cancer treatment plans, radiologists' support, and early diagnosis would all be enhanced by combining these methods with clinical decision-support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/imsa65733.2025.11167683
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Brain Tumor Identification in MRI Data

Ayman Sabry, Mohamed N. Saad, Tamer M. Nassef, Karim Mohamed Abo Alazm
1 citations
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.84
article

Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Brain Tumor Identification in MRI Data

Ayman Sabry, Mohamed N. Saad, Tamer M. Nassef, Karim Mohamed Abo Alazm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patient outcomes depend on the ability to identify brain tumors from MRI images. Using the BraTS Africa dataset, this study examines a hybrid approach that combines deep learning and classical machine learning for the purpose of segmenting and classifying tumor regions from brain MRI images. Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are the five common algorithms that were compared. A preprocessing pipeline emphasized the edges of tumors and enhanced image quality. It featured Otsu and adaptive thresholding, contrast stretching, erosion and dilation morphological operations, Sobel and Laplacian edge detection, greyscale normalization, and histogram equalization. To further enhance feature extraction, advanced methods such as watershed segmentation and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) were applied. CNNs outperformed Random Forest classifiers, achieving an accuracy of 82.86% and F1-score of 0.81, compared to Random Forest’s accuracy of 77.14% and F1-score of 0.79. The study frames the classification problem as a binary diagnostic task, aiming to algorithmically differentiate between pathological (tumor) and non-pathological (healthy) brain regions in MRI imagery. KNN and Logistic Regression yielded lower accuracies of 51.43% and 60%, respectively, underscoring the enhanced discriminative power of modern AI architectures in neuroimaging diagnostics. The proposed hybrid framework demonstrates the efficacy of integrating advanced preprocessing with model-specific strengths to optimize tumor detection. Personalized cancer treatment plans, radiologists' support, and early diagnosis would all be enhanced by combining these methods with clinical decision-support systems.

October 6 University (EG), October University of Modern Sciences and Arts (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.