Ranking Matters: A Comparative Study of BM25, BERT-E5, and Hybrid (BM25 + BERT-E5) Retrival Systems on the SQuAD 2.0 Dataset

In Information Retrieval (IR) systems, retrieving relevant passages or documents for a given query is the major task. Traditional IR models, such as BM25, are based on bag-of-words mechanism which is excel on keyword matching but cannot be capable of the get semantic meanings. On the other hand, neural IR models, such as E5 model, which is created based on the BERT architecture, can capture the meaning between the words with the help of their attention layer mechanism and encoding methods, however employing neural model needs high computational cost. To address these limitations, a hybrid retrieval system is proposed. In this study, a hybrid retrieval system is introduced to combine the strengths of a traditional based (which is BM25) and neural based (which is E5) model. The aim was achieving optimal performance on ranking tasks. To do this, Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) version 2.0 is used, and the performances are evaluated by some metrices. Hybrid architecture is created by the linear combination of traditional and neural systems. The wight parameter (α) is tuned to balance the capabilities of BM25 and E5. The hybrid model outperforms BM25 and E5 models individually on the metrices Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), Precision@5, Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG@5), and Accuracy with optimal performance achieved at α = 0.1. The result of this study shows that hybrid retrieval systems can effectively combine the strengths of both traditional and neural IR models, providing a new methodology for ranking tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166004
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking Matters: A Comparative Study of BM25, BERT-E5, and Hybrid (BM25 + BERT-E5) Retrival Systems on the SQuAD 2.0 Dataset

Hakan Emekci, Şeyma Gülşen Akkuş
Data Quality and Management
article

Ranking Matters: A Comparative Study of BM25, BERT-E5, and Hybrid (BM25 + BERT-E5) Retrival Systems on the SQuAD 2.0 Dataset

Hakan Emekci, Şeyma Gülşen Akkuş
article en

Abstract

In Information Retrieval (IR) systems, retrieving relevant passages or documents for a given query is the major task. Traditional IR models, such as BM25, are based on bag-of-words mechanism which is excel on keyword matching but cannot be capable of the get semantic meanings. On the other hand, neural IR models, such as E5 model, which is created based on the BERT architecture, can capture the meaning between the words with the help of their attention layer mechanism and encoding methods, however employing neural model needs high computational cost. To address these limitations, a hybrid retrieval system is proposed. In this study, a hybrid retrieval system is introduced to combine the strengths of a traditional based (which is BM25) and neural based (which is E5) model. The aim was achieving optimal performance on ranking tasks. To do this, Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) version 2.0 is used, and the performances are evaluated by some metrices. Hybrid architecture is created by the linear combination of traditional and neural systems. The wight parameter (α) is tuned to balance the capabilities of BM25 and E5. The hybrid model outperforms BM25 and E5 models individually on the metrices Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), Precision@5, Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG@5), and Accuracy with optimal performance achieved at α = 0.1. The result of this study shows that hybrid retrieval systems can effectively combine the strengths of both traditional and neural IR models, providing a new methodology for ranking tasks.

TED University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.