Frameworks for Cyberattack Prevention: A Comparative Analysis

This study focuses on preventing cyberattacks by utilizing various frameworks. There are several prominent cybersecurity frameworks, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF), Cyber Essentials, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, and MITRE ATT&CK, all of which are significant in the cybersecurity community. These five frameworks are particularly notable for their emphasis on specific areas of cybersecurity, such as risk management, system protection, and incident response. This analysis compares five security frameworks, focusing on key metrics such as certification requirements, Ownership, Scope, Functions, and Focus. The aim is to provide a guide that helps organizations make informed decisions when choosing security frameworks that align with their specific needs and the ever-changing landscape of digital threats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166447
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frameworks for Cyberattack Prevention: A Comparative Analysis

José Santisteban, Brian Liñan-Acosta, Oscar Bazalar-Gonzales
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Frameworks for Cyberattack Prevention: A Comparative Analysis

José Santisteban, Brian Liñan-Acosta, Oscar Bazalar-Gonzales
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on preventing cyberattacks by utilizing various frameworks. There are several prominent cybersecurity frameworks, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF), Cyber Essentials, COBIT, HITRUST CSF, and MITRE ATT&CK, all of which are significant in the cybersecurity community. These five frameworks are particularly notable for their emphasis on specific areas of cybersecurity, such as risk management, system protection, and incident response. This analysis compares five security frameworks, focusing on key metrics such as certification requirements, Ownership, Scope, Functions, and Focus. The aim is to provide a guide that helps organizations make informed decisions when choosing security frameworks that align with their specific needs and the ever-changing landscape of digital threats.

Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.