Keeping track of the kids: a deep dive into object detector fairness for pedestrians of different ages

As autonomous driving gains increasing prevalence, it is important to ensure these vehicles are safe for everyone who comes across them. While overall performance is a key aspect, that is not the whole picture. Fairness is another crucial topic that needs to be measured when evaluating computer vision models. In our paper, we highlight an important area in which similar groups are not treated equally by current state-of-the-art object and pedestrian detectors. By grouping pedestrian data according to bounding box size and looking for patterns across metrics, we find that children are successfully detected less frequently than adults and that the reason for this disparity is not simply due to their smaller stature, as hypothesized. Additionally, we find that object detectors perform better than pedestrian detectors but are less fair. To this end, we suggest that more work is needed to identify the underlying causes of this complex disparity, and we offer a few possible avenues for doing so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166624
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping track of the kids: a deep dive into object detector fairness for pedestrians of different ages

Latifur Khan, Sadaf MD Halim, Mark Friant
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Keeping track of the kids: a deep dive into object detector fairness for pedestrians of different ages

Latifur Khan, Sadaf MD Halim, Mark Friant
article en

Abstract

As autonomous driving gains increasing prevalence, it is important to ensure these vehicles are safe for everyone who comes across them. While overall performance is a key aspect, that is not the whole picture. Fairness is another crucial topic that needs to be measured when evaluating computer vision models. In our paper, we highlight an important area in which similar groups are not treated equally by current state-of-the-art object and pedestrian detectors. By grouping pedestrian data according to bounding box size and looking for patterns across metrics, we find that children are successfully detected less frequently than adults and that the reason for this disparity is not simply due to their smaller stature, as hypothesized. Additionally, we find that object detectors perform better than pedestrian detectors but are less fair. To this end, we suggest that more work is needed to identify the underlying causes of this complex disparity, and we offer a few possible avenues for doing so.

The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.