High-Performance Attitude Pointing Control for Multi-Target Acquisition in Agile LEO Scientific Satellites

This research compares the performance of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and conventional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) – based controllers for pitch-axis attitude control of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Scientific satellites. The proposed designs aim to achieve high agility for reorientation between multiple targets and stable pointing performance during science observations. To address each of the objectives, two modes of operation were designed – Rapid Slew mode and Science mode - featuring ’High-Performance’ Attitude and Orbital Control Systems (AOCS) for the observation part of the mission. The PID-based controllers were designed analytically, and for the MPC, the attitude control problem was formulated as a Convex Quadratic Optimisation Problem (QP). Similar performance was achieved with PD-based controllers and MPC, with the major difference being the controller demands. Specifically for the Science mode, the analysis shows that MPC requires significantly less torque to achieve the same performance as the PD-based one while also having the lowest Absolute Pointing Error. This study shows the potential of MPC, especially for achieving high-stability pointing in a fuel-efficient and, therefore, mass- and cost-optimal way, which would enable more complex operations for future scientific missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11165877
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Performance Attitude Pointing Control for Multi-Target Acquisition in Agile LEO Scientific Satellites

Yusuf Acar, Isabel Sotirova
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
article

High-Performance Attitude Pointing Control for Multi-Target Acquisition in Agile LEO Scientific Satellites

Yusuf Acar, Isabel Sotirova
article en

Abstract

This research compares the performance of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and conventional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) – based controllers for pitch-axis attitude control of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Scientific satellites. The proposed designs aim to achieve high agility for reorientation between multiple targets and stable pointing performance during science observations. To address each of the objectives, two modes of operation were designed – Rapid Slew mode and Science mode - featuring ’High-Performance’ Attitude and Orbital Control Systems (AOCS) for the observation part of the mission. The PID-based controllers were designed analytically, and for the MPC, the attitude control problem was formulated as a Convex Quadratic Optimisation Problem (QP). Similar performance was achieved with PD-based controllers and MPC, with the major difference being the controller demands. Specifically for the Science mode, the analysis shows that MPC requires significantly less torque to achieve the same performance as the PD-based one while also having the lowest Absolute Pointing Error. This study shows the potential of MPC, especially for achieving high-stability pointing in a fuel-efficient and, therefore, mass- and cost-optimal way, which would enable more complex operations for future scientific missions.

University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

High-Performance Attitude Pointing Control for Multi-Target Acquisition in Agile LEO Scientific Satellites — Yusuf Acar, Isabel Sotirova · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS