Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study

Despite the roll-out of cervical cancer screening within routine health facilities, uptake of cervical cancer screening in Malawi remains low due to factors such as privacy concerns, stigma, and distance to health facility. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing offers a viable alternative to provider-delivered sampling, resolving issues with accessibility and privacy related barriers. However, there is limited understanding of the acceptability of self-sampling among women in low-income settings. We aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, and acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening. We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study among ten purposively sampled women screening for cervical cancer at a rural hospital in Malawi. Data collection instruments and the thematic analytical approach were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Key constructs that were central to this analysis included affective attitude, burden, self-efficacy, intervention coherence, and perceived effectiveness. Self-sampling emerged as a culturally and socially acceptable diagnostic practice by the women, mediated by emic values of privacy, bodily autonomy, and convenience. Women valued the ability to autonomously collect samples, which allowed them to circumvent discomfort and perceived invasiveness linked to speculum use, especially by male clinicians. Sociocultural barriers such as limited literacy levels, poor access to transport, and a lack of spousal approval restricted broader acceptability. Facilitators of acceptability included comprehension of the intervention, confidence in the self-sampling process, and the potential of the intervention to increase screening uptake, reduce cervical cancer screening-related stigma and reduce healthcare worker burden. Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening is an acceptable and promising alternative for improving the uptake of screening among women in Malawi and similar low-income countries. Scale-up of this approach will require addressing socio-cultural barriers through optimising instructional materials, engaging male partners, and leveraging community health workers for scaled community implementation via task-sharing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004763
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study

Chisomo Lawrence Msefula, Vanitha N. Sivalingam, Moses Kumwenda, Madalo Mukoka et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study

Chisomo Lawrence Msefula, Vanitha N. Sivalingam, Moses Kumwenda, Madalo Mukoka, Maria Lisa Odland, Marriott Nliwasa, Hussein H. Twabi, Dennis Solomon, Wakumanya Sibande, Takondwa Msosa, D. Lissauer, Owen Mhango, Chikumbutso Chipandwe
article en

Abstract

Despite the roll-out of cervical cancer screening within routine health facilities, uptake of cervical cancer screening in Malawi remains low due to factors such as privacy concerns, stigma, and distance to health facility. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing offers a viable alternative to provider-delivered sampling, resolving issues with accessibility and privacy related barriers. However, there is limited understanding of the acceptability of self-sampling among women in low-income settings. We aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, and acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening. We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study among ten purposively sampled women screening for cervical cancer at a rural hospital in Malawi. Data collection instruments and the thematic analytical approach were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Key constructs that were central to this analysis included affective attitude, burden, self-efficacy, intervention coherence, and perceived effectiveness. Self-sampling emerged as a culturally and socially acceptable diagnostic practice by the women, mediated by emic values of privacy, bodily autonomy, and convenience. Women valued the ability to autonomously collect samples, which allowed them to circumvent discomfort and perceived invasiveness linked to speculum use, especially by male clinicians. Sociocultural barriers such as limited literacy levels, poor access to transport, and a lack of spousal approval restricted broader acceptability. Facilitators of acceptability included comprehension of the intervention, confidence in the self-sampling process, and the potential of the intervention to increase screening uptake, reduce cervical cancer screening-related stigma and reduce healthcare worker burden. Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening is an acceptable and promising alternative for improving the uptake of screening among women in Malawi and similar low-income countries. Scale-up of this approach will require addressing socio-cultural barriers through optimising instructional materials, engaging male partners, and leveraging community health workers for scaled community implementation via task-sharing.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(9)
University of Liverpool (GB), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MW), Kamuzu Central Hospital (MW), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (NL), Ministry of Health (MW), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (MW), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.