Exploration of Game Engines for Fluid Dynamics Simulation: A Comparative Study of Houdini and Unreal Engine

Game engines such as Houdini and Unreal Engine are increasingly explored for fluid dynamics simulations (FDS). This study evaluates their highlights, emphasising their strengths and weaknesses, and provides insight into their potential in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particularly for pre-processing and post-processing applications. A comparison of Houdini’s Pyro Solver and Unreal Engine’s Niagara system is made using a sphere as a test case. The results show that Houdini provides more accurate and controlled fluid simulations, allowing for detailed parameter control and the extraction of usable velocity fields. Unreal Engine, while excelling in real-time visualisation, faces limitations in data extraction. It shows that Houdini is better suited for pre-processing tasks, while Unreal Engine is more suitable for interactive post-processing visualization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166488
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration of Game Engines for Fluid Dynamics Simulation: A Comparative Study of Houdini and Unreal Engine

Strazzeri Ilario, Smets Florian, Quinten Julien, Demarbaix Anthonin
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Exploration of Game Engines for Fluid Dynamics Simulation: A Comparative Study of Houdini and Unreal Engine

Strazzeri Ilario, Smets Florian, Quinten Julien, Demarbaix Anthonin
article en

Abstract

Game engines such as Houdini and Unreal Engine are increasingly explored for fluid dynamics simulations (FDS). This study evaluates their highlights, emphasising their strengths and weaknesses, and provides insight into their potential in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), particularly for pre-processing and post-processing applications. A comparison of Houdini’s Pyro Solver and Unreal Engine’s Niagara system is made using a sphere as a test case. The results show that Houdini provides more accurate and controlled fluid simulations, allowing for detailed parameter control and the extraction of usable velocity fields. Unreal Engine, while excelling in real-time visualisation, faces limitations in data extraction. It shows that Houdini is better suited for pre-processing tasks, while Unreal Engine is more suitable for interactive post-processing visualization.

Haute École Provinciale de Hainaut Condorcet (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploration of Game Engines for Fluid Dynamics Simulation: A Comparative Study of Houdini and Unreal Engine — Strazzeri Ilario, Smets Florian, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS