Comprehensive Evaluation of L2 Regularization in UNet-ResNet50 and UNet-VGG16 Models with Diverse Image Transformations

Automated medical image segmentation is essential for clinical diagnosis and reduces the reliance on manual annotation. Deep learning models exhibit high accuracy but suffer from overfitting and sensitivity to image perturbations. Regularization methods, including L2 weight decomposition, mitigate these issues by limiting model complexity. This study evaluates the impact of L2 regularization on segmentation robustness using the UNet, UNet-ResNet50, and UNet-VGG16 architectures. The effect of regularization on model generalization is evaluated under structured perturbations. Chest X-ray datasets from Montgomery and Shenzhen were used. Segmentation models were trained with and without L2 regularization at λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> and λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-3</sup>. Gaussian noise and blur were applied for testing. The novelty of the work lies in the analysis of the correlation between the L2 regularization parameters and the robustness of the models to noise and blurring of the input data, revealing optimal configurations for preserving segmentation accuracy under conditions of image degradation. In contrast to previous studies that focus on improving segmentation accuracy, this paper conducts an extensive study of how L2 regularization affects the resilience of different architectures to distortion in structured input signals. Regularisation at the level of λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> enhanced reliability without substantially affecting the segmentation accuracy of the original images. However, this moderate regularisation resulted in a minor compromise, the Dice estimate for the UNet-VGG16 model decreased by 1.6 percentage points on these pristine images. The regularised models demonstrated a tendency to exhibit reduced degradation when subjected to the effects of noise and blurring. It is found that the UNet-VGG16 architecture with a regularization factor of λ=10⁻<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sup> achieves an optimal balance between a Dice segmentation accuracy of 0.94 and robustness to image perturbations. These results contribute to the methodology of optimizing deep neural networks for medical segmentation tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166386
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of L2 Regularization in UNet-ResNet50 and UNet-VGG16 Models with Diverse Image Transformations

Assel Mukasheva, Kuanysh Alipbayev, Jeong Won Kang, Dina Koishiyeva et al.
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of L2 Regularization in UNet-ResNet50 and UNet-VGG16 Models with Diverse Image Transformations

Assel Mukasheva, Kuanysh Alipbayev, Jeong Won Kang, Dina Koishiyeva, Adil Mukhamedgali
article en

Abstract

Automated medical image segmentation is essential for clinical diagnosis and reduces the reliance on manual annotation. Deep learning models exhibit high accuracy but suffer from overfitting and sensitivity to image perturbations. Regularization methods, including L2 weight decomposition, mitigate these issues by limiting model complexity. This study evaluates the impact of L2 regularization on segmentation robustness using the UNet, UNet-ResNet50, and UNet-VGG16 architectures. The effect of regularization on model generalization is evaluated under structured perturbations. Chest X-ray datasets from Montgomery and Shenzhen were used. Segmentation models were trained with and without L2 regularization at λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> and λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-3</sup>. Gaussian noise and blur were applied for testing. The novelty of the work lies in the analysis of the correlation between the L2 regularization parameters and the robustness of the models to noise and blurring of the input data, revealing optimal configurations for preserving segmentation accuracy under conditions of image degradation. In contrast to previous studies that focus on improving segmentation accuracy, this paper conducts an extensive study of how L2 regularization affects the resilience of different architectures to distortion in structured input signals. Regularisation at the level of λ = 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> enhanced reliability without substantially affecting the segmentation accuracy of the original images. However, this moderate regularisation resulted in a minor compromise, the Dice estimate for the UNet-VGG16 model decreased by 1.6 percentage points on these pristine images. The regularised models demonstrated a tendency to exhibit reduced degradation when subjected to the effects of noise and blurring. It is found that the UNet-VGG16 architecture with a regularization factor of λ=10⁻<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sup> achieves an optimal balance between a Dice segmentation accuracy of 0.94 and robustness to image perturbations. These results contribute to the methodology of optimizing deep neural networks for medical segmentation tasks.

Korea National University of Transportation (KR), Kazakh-British Technical University (KZ), Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.