Improving Privacy Budget Auditing of Differentially Private Artificial Intelligence Models Through Variance of Model Parameters

Differential privacy (DP) is introduced into many fields of AI to preserve privacy. However, introducing DP into AI models is extremely error-prone. To verify whether DP AI models can provide privacy guarantee (quantified by privacy budget) as these models claim, existing methods utilize attack methods to audit whether privacy budget of these models is the same as these models claim. To further improve precision of privacy budget auditing, we propose a brand new way to audit privacy budget, namely directly utilizing the parameters of DP AI models to audit privacy budget. In particular, our method utilizes statistical characteristics variance of the output distribution of DP mechanism to audit privacy budget of DP mechanism. DP AI models are regarded as data samples from output distribution of DP AI model training method and are utilized to approximate the variance of output distribution. The approximated variance is leveraged to estimate the variance of noise distribution of DP mechanism and through the relationship between noise variance and privacy budget, our method calculates the audited privacy budget through estimated noise variance. In addition, to reduce computation overhead, our method constructs parameter selection strategy to identify position whose parameter is suitable for privacy budget auditing. Comprehensive experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of our auditing method. Comparison results of five competitive auditing methods demonstrate that our method decreases MAE by 18.29% and decreases MSE by 23.17% on experiment datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2025.3613955
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Privacy Budget Auditing of Differentially Private Artificial Intelligence Models Through Variance of Model Parameters

Wen Huang, Mingxuan Jia, Yongjian Liao, Wenzheng Xu et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

Improving Privacy Budget Auditing of Differentially Private Artificial Intelligence Models Through Variance of Model Parameters

Wen Huang, Mingxuan Jia, Yongjian Liao, Wenzheng Xu, Weixin Zhao, Zhishuo Zhang, Jian Peng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Differential privacy (DP) is introduced into many fields of AI to preserve privacy. However, introducing DP into AI models is extremely error-prone. To verify whether DP AI models can provide privacy guarantee (quantified by privacy budget) as these models claim, existing methods utilize attack methods to audit whether privacy budget of these models is the same as these models claim. To further improve precision of privacy budget auditing, we propose a brand new way to audit privacy budget, namely directly utilizing the parameters of DP AI models to audit privacy budget. In particular, our method utilizes statistical characteristics variance of the output distribution of DP mechanism to audit privacy budget of DP mechanism. DP AI models are regarded as data samples from output distribution of DP AI model training method and are utilized to approximate the variance of output distribution. The approximated variance is leveraged to estimate the variance of noise distribution of DP mechanism and through the relationship between noise variance and privacy budget, our method calculates the audited privacy budget through estimated noise variance. In addition, to reduce computation overhead, our method constructs parameter selection strategy to identify position whose parameter is suitable for privacy budget auditing. Comprehensive experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of our auditing method. Comparison results of five competitive auditing methods demonstrate that our method decreases MAE by 18.29% and decreases MSE by 23.17% on experiment datasets.

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecurityVol. 20
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Chengdu University (CN), Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.