Iterative Modeling via Structural Diffusion ( <scp>IMSD</scp> ): Exploring Fold‐Switching Pathways in Metamorphic Proteins Using <scp>AlphaFold2</scp> ‐Based Generative Diffusion Model <scp>UFConf</scp>

Metamorphic proteins (MPs) can fold into two or more distinct spatial structures. Increasing interest in MPs has spurred the search for computational tools to predict proteins fold-switching potential and model their refolding pathways. Here we address this problem by using the recently reported generative diffusion predictor UFConf, based on the AlphaFold2 network. We have developed a new UFConf-driven algorithm dubbed IMSD (iterative modeling via structural diffusion) to model the MP's path from one conformational state to another. In brief, we begin with the experimental structure of state A, perturb it through the "noising" process, and infer a number of models (replicas) through the reverse diffusion or "denoising" process. From this set of models, we choose the one that is closest to the alternative structure B; then we use it as a starting point to perform another round of noising/denoising and thus generate the next batch of replicas. Repeating this process in an iterative fashion, we have been able to map the entire path from state A to state B for metamorphic proteins GA98, SA1 V90T, and the C-terminal domain of RfaH. The obtained representation of the fold-switching pathways in these MPs is consistent with the dual-funnel energy landscape observed in the previous modeling studies and shows good agreement with the available experimental data. The new UFConf-based IMSD protocol can be viewed as a part of the emerging generation of modeling tools aiming to model protein dynamics by means of deep learning technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70050
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iterative Modeling via Structural Diffusion ( IMSD ): Exploring Fold‐Switching Pathways in Metamorphic Proteins Using AlphaFold2 ‐Based Generative Diffusion Model UFConf

Nikolai R. Skrynnikov, Dmitrii A. Luzik
1 citations
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.81
article

Iterative Modeling via Structural Diffusion ( IMSD ): Exploring Fold‐Switching Pathways in Metamorphic Proteins Using AlphaFold2 ‐Based Generative Diffusion Model UFConf

Nikolai R. Skrynnikov, Dmitrii A. Luzik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Metamorphic proteins (MPs) can fold into two or more distinct spatial structures. Increasing interest in MPs has spurred the search for computational tools to predict proteins fold-switching potential and model their refolding pathways. Here we address this problem by using the recently reported generative diffusion predictor UFConf, based on the AlphaFold2 network. We have developed a new UFConf-driven algorithm dubbed IMSD (iterative modeling via structural diffusion) to model the MP's path from one conformational state to another. In brief, we begin with the experimental structure of state A, perturb it through the "noising" process, and infer a number of models (replicas) through the reverse diffusion or "denoising" process. From this set of models, we choose the one that is closest to the alternative structure B; then we use it as a starting point to perform another round of noising/denoising and thus generate the next batch of replicas. Repeating this process in an iterative fashion, we have been able to map the entire path from state A to state B for metamorphic proteins GA98, SA1 V90T, and the C-terminal domain of RfaH. The obtained representation of the fold-switching pathways in these MPs is consistent with the dual-funnel energy landscape observed in the previous modeling studies and shows good agreement with the available experimental data. The new UFConf-based IMSD protocol can be viewed as a part of the emerging generation of modeling tools aiming to model protein dynamics by means of deep learning technology.

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsVol. 94(2)
University of Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US), St Petersburg University (RU), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Saint Petersburg State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.