Insect biological control: a global perspective

The intentional use of biological control agents to manage arthropod pests dates back to as early as 304 AD, when Chinese farmers used weaver ants to manage citrus pests. Over time, biological control has evolved into distinct approaches: classical, augmentation, and conservation. Prior to the advent of pesticides, most insect pest management relied on natural and classical biological control. The most common strategy used at first, despite regional variations, was the importation of biological control agents. Nonetheless, due to issues with unintentional non-target impacts, numerous failures in the introduction, and longer periods required for implementation, augmentative and conservation approaches have become more frequently practiced. Additionally, growing demands from the government and the public for more sustainable farming, along with investments from private companies, have sped up the progress and use of augmentative biological control around the world. This extensive use of insect biological control agents and the ongoing development of new insights underscore the need for a thorough and up-to-date global review. We combine expertise from several world regions to address the unique historical, developmental, and regional challenges associated with augmentative insect biological control. From region to region, we observed differences in pest-natural enemy systems, places of implementation (greenhouse vs. field), type and level of investment (public vs. private), history of implementation, awareness of ecologically based strategies, and other factors. There are also many similarities, especially regarding the upcoming challenges in addressing the rising demand from the agricultural sector and climate change. These include producing and assessing the quality of biological control agents, establishing more biological control enterprises, improving the logistics of natural enemy transportation, making more use of native biological control agents in augmentative biological control, optimizing the utilization of mass-reared and resident biological control agents, increasing the application of ecologically based strategies at local and landscape levels, and promoting interdisciplinary collaborations. Taken together, the article offers an examination of the distinctive aspects of augmentative biological control programs and their associated challenges around the world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Entomologia Generalis
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/3237
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect behavior and control techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insect biological control: a global perspective

Blas Lavandero, G.J. Messelink, Bonoukpoè Mawuko Sokame, José Refugio Lomelí-Flores et al.
2 citations
Entomologia Generalis
Insect behavior and control techniques
3.34
article

Insect biological control: a global perspective

Blas Lavandero, G.J. Messelink, Bonoukpoè Mawuko Sokame, José Refugio Lomelí-Flores, Jorge B. Torres, Germán Vargas, Margarita Rocca, Lian‐Sheng Zang, Hugo C. Arredondo‐Bernal, Roselyne Labbé, Martin Patrick Hill, Mario Enrique Rodríguez-García, Nicolas Desneux, Stephen J. Thackeray, Marie D’Ottavio, Myron P. Zalucki, Paul K. Abram, Michael J. Furlong, Ainara Peñalver‐Cruz, Alejandro C. Costamagna, Alberto Urbaneja, Nancy M. Greco, Raymond A. Cloyd, Éric Lucas, Armando Alfaro-Tapia, Antonio Biondi, Lessando M. Gontijo, Tianhao Li, José Ron Parra
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The intentional use of biological control agents to manage arthropod pests dates back to as early as 304 AD, when Chinese farmers used weaver ants to manage citrus pests. Over time, biological control has evolved into distinct approaches: classical, augmentation, and conservation. Prior to the advent of pesticides, most insect pest management relied on natural and classical biological control. The most common strategy used at first, despite regional variations, was the importation of biological control agents. Nonetheless, due to issues with unintentional non-target impacts, numerous failures in the introduction, and longer periods required for implementation, augmentative and conservation approaches have become more frequently practiced. Additionally, growing demands from the government and the public for more sustainable farming, along with investments from private companies, have sped up the progress and use of augmentative biological control around the world. This extensive use of insect biological control agents and the ongoing development of new insights underscore the need for a thorough and up-to-date global review. We combine expertise from several world regions to address the unique historical, developmental, and regional challenges associated with augmentative insect biological control. From region to region, we observed differences in pest-natural enemy systems, places of implementation (greenhouse vs. field), type and level of investment (public vs. private), history of implementation, awareness of ecologically based strategies, and other factors. There are also many similarities, especially regarding the upcoming challenges in addressing the rising demand from the agricultural sector and climate change. These include producing and assessing the quality of biological control agents, establishing more biological control enterprises, improving the logistics of natural enemy transportation, making more use of native biological control agents in augmentative biological control, optimizing the utilization of mass-reared and resident biological control agents, increasing the application of ecologically based strategies at local and landscape levels, and promoting interdisciplinary collaborations. Taken together, the article offers an examination of the distinctive aspects of augmentative biological control programs and their associated challenges around the world.

Entomologia GeneralisVol. 45(4)
European Commission, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Insect behavior and control techniques
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.