Racialized unaccompanied minors: African children in United States immigration detention

Abstract Border policing and enforcement produce “spectacles” foregrounding the “illegality” of migrants of all ages. These practices reinforce policies that racialize meanings of citizenship. The United States government’s detention of unaccompanied migrant children qualifies as one such “spectacle,” yet little research has examined the disparate treatment children receive based on their region of origin. We use a complete census of all unaccompanied migrant children admitted into Office of Refugee Resettlement custody between October 1, 2014, and March 1, 2023, to compare the experiences of 794 African unaccompanied children with those of their non-African peers. Our results suggest that US government detention of unaccompanied migrant children reflects racialized notions of citizenship and belonging. Children from African countries experienced greater suspicion, surveillance, and punishment compared to non-African children. They spent far longer in ORR custody, in more restrictive settings, and were more likely to lose the protections afforded children as they aged out or underwent an age redetermination. At the same time, African children experienced the positive outcome of immigration relief while in ORR custody at a rate far exceeding other children. These comparative findings make visible for the first time the unique experiences of unaccompanied African children in US immigration detention, experiences that enable further racialization of citizenship inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Migration Studies
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00493-5
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racialized unaccompanied minors: African children in United States immigration detention

Hayley Pierce, Jane Lilly López, Melissa Alcaraz, Kif Augustine‐Adams
Comparative Migration Studies
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Racialized unaccompanied minors: African children in United States immigration detention

Hayley Pierce, Jane Lilly López, Melissa Alcaraz, Kif Augustine‐Adams
article en

Abstract

Abstract Border policing and enforcement produce “spectacles” foregrounding the “illegality” of migrants of all ages. These practices reinforce policies that racialize meanings of citizenship. The United States government’s detention of unaccompanied migrant children qualifies as one such “spectacle,” yet little research has examined the disparate treatment children receive based on their region of origin. We use a complete census of all unaccompanied migrant children admitted into Office of Refugee Resettlement custody between October 1, 2014, and March 1, 2023, to compare the experiences of 794 African unaccompanied children with those of their non-African peers. Our results suggest that US government detention of unaccompanied migrant children reflects racialized notions of citizenship and belonging. Children from African countries experienced greater suspicion, surveillance, and punishment compared to non-African children. They spent far longer in ORR custody, in more restrictive settings, and were more likely to lose the protections afforded children as they aged out or underwent an age redetermination. At the same time, African children experienced the positive outcome of immigration relief while in ORR custody at a rate far exceeding other children. These comparative findings make visible for the first time the unique experiences of unaccompanied African children in US immigration detention, experiences that enable further racialization of citizenship inequalities.

Comparative Migration StudiesVol. 13(1)
Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.