Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Development: Contested Spaces of Regulating Bamboo Shoots in China's Giant Panda National Park

ABSTRACT This article investigates how China's nascent national‐park regime reshapes property relations and rural livelihoods through the contested regulation of bamboo‐shoot harvesting in Rivercross County's portion of the Giant Panda National Park. Participant observation, in‐depth interviews and an analysis of conservation statutes and local archival materials trace different phases of resource governance, from subsistence gathering to market‐driven auctions and today's zoning‐based bans. Ambiguous boundaries, discretionary enforcement and a state‐backed ‘cultivation’ program do not simply dispossess villagers; they carve out a legally grey zone where officials and residents co‐produce flexible property arrangements that both meet conservation metrics and keep livelihoods precariously viable. By foregrounding everyday performances of compliance, the study refines green‐grabbing debates and shows that China's conservation project advances not through total enclosure but through the productive ambiguity of law and space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agrarian Change
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70041
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Development: Contested Spaces of Regulating Bamboo Shoots in China's Giant Panda National Park

Fan Li
2 citations
Journal of Agrarian Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
article

Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Development: Contested Spaces of Regulating Bamboo Shoots in China's Giant Panda National Park

Fan Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates how China's nascent national‐park regime reshapes property relations and rural livelihoods through the contested regulation of bamboo‐shoot harvesting in Rivercross County's portion of the Giant Panda National Park. Participant observation, in‐depth interviews and an analysis of conservation statutes and local archival materials trace different phases of resource governance, from subsistence gathering to market‐driven auctions and today's zoning‐based bans. Ambiguous boundaries, discretionary enforcement and a state‐backed ‘cultivation’ program do not simply dispossess villagers; they carve out a legally grey zone where officials and residents co‐produce flexible property arrangements that both meet conservation metrics and keep livelihoods precariously viable. By foregrounding everyday performances of compliance, the study refines green‐grabbing debates and shows that China's conservation project advances not through total enclosure but through the productive ambiguity of law and space.

Journal of Agrarian Change
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Development: Contested Spaces of Regulating Bamboo Shoots in China's Giant Panda National Park — Fan Li · Journal of Agrarian Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS