Physician and endoscopy nurse perspectives on tap water for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a cross-sectional survey on support, perceived barriers, and intent to advocate

Abstract Background The standard water used for endoscopic irrigation is sterile water. Minimal evidence exists regarding sterile water use where there is access to clean water. The WHO has declared the climate crisis as the greatest global health crisis today; we must re-examine our practices and adapt them to promote environmental stewardship while maintaining safety. Method and objective We surveyed physicians and endoscopy nurses to determine their attitudes toward tap water use for irrigation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Results There were 88 complete responses collected from June to November 2024. The majority of respondents and endoscopy-performing consultants expressed comfort with tap water use (59 and 84%, respectively), perceived viability (62 and 68%, respectively), and an interest to implement (73 and 94%, respectively); however, discussions on the topic remained infrequent (77 and 81%, respectively). 82% of overall respondents and 93% of consultants were aware of potential cost-savings, with 69% and 87% more willing to consider tap water based on this. Respondents (60%) and consultants (73%) agree there is a lack of guidelines regarding tap water use and feel that policy barriers will hinder change (59 and 73% respectively). Overall, 59% of respondents and 73% of consultants are likely to advocate for change. Conclusion The majority of respondents view tap water as a viable, cost-effective alternative with environmental benefits. A strong intention to advocate for change highlights the presence of potential leaders in this space. By promoting and supporting these leaders through education and institutional change, a more sustainable future for endoscopy exists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Medicine
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-025-00373-y
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physician and endoscopy nurse perspectives on tap water for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a cross-sectional survey on support, perceived barriers, and intent to advocate

Hannah Anderson, Matthew Schultzel, Sten Kajitani, Anthony James Goodings et al.
Discover Medicine
Stoma care and complications
article

Physician and endoscopy nurse perspectives on tap water for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a cross-sectional survey on support, perceived barriers, and intent to advocate

Hannah Anderson, Matthew Schultzel, Sten Kajitani, Anthony James Goodings, Allison Dana Chhor, A. M. O'Sullivan, Ann-Marie Eustaceryan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The standard water used for endoscopic irrigation is sterile water. Minimal evidence exists regarding sterile water use where there is access to clean water. The WHO has declared the climate crisis as the greatest global health crisis today; we must re-examine our practices and adapt them to promote environmental stewardship while maintaining safety. Method and objective We surveyed physicians and endoscopy nurses to determine their attitudes toward tap water use for irrigation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Results There were 88 complete responses collected from June to November 2024. The majority of respondents and endoscopy-performing consultants expressed comfort with tap water use (59 and 84%, respectively), perceived viability (62 and 68%, respectively), and an interest to implement (73 and 94%, respectively); however, discussions on the topic remained infrequent (77 and 81%, respectively). 82% of overall respondents and 93% of consultants were aware of potential cost-savings, with 69% and 87% more willing to consider tap water based on this. Respondents (60%) and consultants (73%) agree there is a lack of guidelines regarding tap water use and feel that policy barriers will hinder change (59 and 73% respectively). Overall, 59% of respondents and 73% of consultants are likely to advocate for change. Conclusion The majority of respondents view tap water as a viable, cost-effective alternative with environmental benefits. A strong intention to advocate for change highlights the presence of potential leaders in this space. By promoting and supporting these leaders through education and institutional change, a more sustainable future for endoscopy exists.

Discover MedicineVol. 2(1)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University College Cork (IE), South Tipperary General Hospital (IE), Cork University Hospital (IE), Doctors Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Stoma care and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.