British European Policy and the 2024 General Election: Normal Service Has Been Resumed

It is tempting to place British European policy at the heart of any discussion of recent British instability: the 2016 referendum unleashed a wave of disruption and systemic effects that continue to the present. This article argues that while the immediate destabilisation of Brexit has been contained and moderated, the 2024 General Election highlighted a longer-term source of instability, running throughout the post-1945 period as consequence of a failure (or inability) to resolve the fundamental purpose of relations with ‘the Continent’. Starting from the General Election campaign, the article also considers the first months of the Labour government before using primary and secondary data to explore the notion that policy is mainly driven by domestic considerations and incentives, resulting in over-inflating expectations, a lack of constructive engagement with European counterparts and a subsequent disillusionment. European policy is likely to continue to be a site of unstable policy outcomes, given the reactive managerial approach, even as there is a degree of stability created by the European Union’s caution about upsetting the hard-won agreements on British withdrawal and on the basic architecture of the future relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revue française de civilisation britannique
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/14qkl
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

British European Policy and the 2024 General Election: Normal Service Has Been Resumed

Simon Usherwood
Revue française de civilisation britannique
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

British European Policy and the 2024 General Election: Normal Service Has Been Resumed

Simon Usherwood
article en

Abstract

It is tempting to place British European policy at the heart of any discussion of recent British instability: the 2016 referendum unleashed a wave of disruption and systemic effects that continue to the present. This article argues that while the immediate destabilisation of Brexit has been contained and moderated, the 2024 General Election highlighted a longer-term source of instability, running throughout the post-1945 period as consequence of a failure (or inability) to resolve the fundamental purpose of relations with ‘the Continent’. Starting from the General Election campaign, the article also considers the first months of the Labour government before using primary and secondary data to explore the notion that policy is mainly driven by domestic considerations and incentives, resulting in over-inflating expectations, a lack of constructive engagement with European counterparts and a subsequent disillusionment. European policy is likely to continue to be a site of unstable policy outcomes, given the reactive managerial approach, even as there is a degree of stability created by the European Union’s caution about upsetting the hard-won agreements on British withdrawal and on the basic architecture of the future relationship.

Revue française de civilisation britanniqueVol. XXX-3
Université Européenne de Bretagne (FR), Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.