Radiocarbon Dating Insect Samples: New Data and Recommendations

Radiocarbon dating insects is difficult because insects are small, fragile, and rarely found in sufficient quantities. Interactions between the chitin in the insect body and sources of carbon contamination are less well understood than for collagen and cellulose-based organic materials such as bone and plant remains. Thus there is as yet no single radiocarbon pretreatment that reliably removes all contaminating carbon across all types of insect remains. Various studies have highlighted important information concerning the practicalities and applicability of different approaches to radiocarbon dating insect remains. However, there are no papers that synthesise findings across different studies. Here, we present a review of previous work alongside new data to investigate different chemical approaches to sample processing and long-term storage and their impact on the chemistry of samples and contaminants. This confirms the difficulty of removing contamination from older samples while retaining sufficient pretreated material for subsequent measurement. It also shows that Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy does not always provide sufficient resolution to detect carbon contamination from non-insect sources with confidence. Thus, insect samples that have been in contact with paraffin or stored in ethanol for an extended period of time should not be selected for radiocarbon dating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Archaeology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2025.2561284
Primary Topic
Fossil Insects in Amber
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiocarbon Dating Insect Samples: New Data and Recommendations

David Smith, Philippa Ascough, Fiona Brock, Rebecca M. Briant
Environmental Archaeology
Fossil Insects in Amber
article

Radiocarbon Dating Insect Samples: New Data and Recommendations

David Smith, Philippa Ascough, Fiona Brock, Rebecca M. Briant
article en

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating insects is difficult because insects are small, fragile, and rarely found in sufficient quantities. Interactions between the chitin in the insect body and sources of carbon contamination are less well understood than for collagen and cellulose-based organic materials such as bone and plant remains. Thus there is as yet no single radiocarbon pretreatment that reliably removes all contaminating carbon across all types of insect remains. Various studies have highlighted important information concerning the practicalities and applicability of different approaches to radiocarbon dating insect remains. However, there are no papers that synthesise findings across different studies. Here, we present a review of previous work alongside new data to investigate different chemical approaches to sample processing and long-term storage and their impact on the chemistry of samples and contaminants. This confirms the difficulty of removing contamination from older samples while retaining sufficient pretreated material for subsequent measurement. It also shows that Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy does not always provide sufficient resolution to detect carbon contamination from non-insect sources with confidence. Thus, insect samples that have been in contact with paraffin or stored in ethanol for an extended period of time should not be selected for radiocarbon dating.

Environmental Archaeology
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Cranfield University (GB), Defence Academy of the United Kingdom (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Fossil Insects in Amber
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.