Assessing the prevalence and the underdiagnosis of aspiration pneumonia among older hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia using an artificial intelligence algorithm

a) AP prevalence following traditional clinical practice (ICD-10 J69.0, AP codification) on discharge was 15.57% (n=2,430, 86.73±7.43 years); b) Estimated AP prevalence related to OD identified with AIMS-OD, was 25.32% (n=3,951, 85.11±8.78 years); c) AIMS-OD identified 84.77% (n=2,060, 87.17±7.09 years) of clinically diagnosed patients (ICD-10 J69.0), and 1,891 additional cases of AP (82.87±9.84 years) undetected by clinical practice, distinguishing them from pneumonia patients without OD in seconds. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AP following traditional clinical practice among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia was 15.57%. AIMS-OD revealed a potential prevalence of AP of 25.32%. AIMS-OD allows to increase by 62.6% the detection of AP related to OD versus traditional clinical practice among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia. AIMS-OD allows massive, immediate, and accurate identification of OD on hospital admission, from which AP cases can be identified, enabling early and specific treatment to improve the poor clinical outcomes of these unrecognized patients with AP and prevent its recurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pneumonia
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-025-00175-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the prevalence and the underdiagnosis of aspiration pneumonia among older hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia using an artificial intelligence algorithm

Omar Ortega, Cristina Amadó, Jaume Miró, Ramón Boixeda et al.
1 citations
Pneumonia
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
3.12
article

Assessing the prevalence and the underdiagnosis of aspiration pneumonia among older hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia using an artificial intelligence algorithm

Omar Ortega, Cristina Amadó, Jaume Miró, Ramón Boixeda, Yuki Yoshimatsu, Dorte Melgaard, Père Clavé, Alberto Martín, Clàudia Sitges-Milà
article en
1 citations

Abstract

a) AP prevalence following traditional clinical practice (ICD-10 J69.0, AP codification) on discharge was 15.57% (n=2,430, 86.73±7.43 years); b) Estimated AP prevalence related to OD identified with AIMS-OD, was 25.32% (n=3,951, 85.11±8.78 years); c) AIMS-OD identified 84.77% (n=2,060, 87.17±7.09 years) of clinically diagnosed patients (ICD-10 J69.0), and 1,891 additional cases of AP (82.87±9.84 years) undetected by clinical practice, distinguishing them from pneumonia patients without OD in seconds. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AP following traditional clinical practice among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia was 15.57%. AIMS-OD revealed a potential prevalence of AP of 25.32%. AIMS-OD allows to increase by 62.6% the detection of AP related to OD versus traditional clinical practice among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia. AIMS-OD allows massive, immediate, and accurate identification of OD on hospital admission, from which AP cases can be identified, enabling early and specific treatment to improve the poor clinical outcomes of these unrecognized patients with AP and prevent its recurrence.

PneumoniaVol. 17(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Maresme Health Consortium (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES), Hospital de Mataró (ES), University of Greenwich (GB), Aalborg University (DK)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.