Deconstruction et justice en langue de systemes : sur quelques lectures derridiennes d’outre-rhin

This paper explores the reception of Jacques Derrida’s work among system theoreticians, especially those who gravitate around Niklas Luhmann. Luhmann’s readings of Derrida suggest that he saw in deconstruction a contemporary evolution within the system of society. This evolution brought systemic foundation paradoxes to light in an unprecedented way. In Luhmann’s view, however, Systems Theory should precisely reflect on the possible deparadoxification of the problems presented by Derrida. We argue against the oversimplification that suggests a deconstructive penchant for paradoxes juxtaposed with a system-theoretical inclination to resolve them. The intricacies of this interplay become particularly apparent in the examination of the concept of justice. Through an exploration of Derrida and Luhmann’s writings on the subject, we assert that deconstruction does not neatly align with a formula for transcendence, as suggested by Gunther Teubner. Instead, it manifests as an aporetic state, embodying both the condition of possibility and the condition of impossibility of normative systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labyrinth
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v27i1.379
Primary Topic
Migration, Identity, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstruction et justice en langue de systemes : sur quelques lectures derridiennes d’outre-rhin

Gabriel Rezende
Labyrinth
Migration, Identity, and Health
article

Deconstruction et justice en langue de systemes : sur quelques lectures derridiennes d’outre-rhin

Gabriel Rezende
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the reception of Jacques Derrida’s work among system theoreticians, especially those who gravitate around Niklas Luhmann. Luhmann’s readings of Derrida suggest that he saw in deconstruction a contemporary evolution within the system of society. This evolution brought systemic foundation paradoxes to light in an unprecedented way. In Luhmann’s view, however, Systems Theory should precisely reflect on the possible deparadoxification of the problems presented by Derrida. We argue against the oversimplification that suggests a deconstructive penchant for paradoxes juxtaposed with a system-theoretical inclination to resolve them. The intricacies of this interplay become particularly apparent in the examination of the concept of justice. Through an exploration of Derrida and Luhmann’s writings on the subject, we assert that deconstruction does not neatly align with a formula for transcendence, as suggested by Gunther Teubner. Instead, it manifests as an aporetic state, embodying both the condition of possibility and the condition of impossibility of normative systems.

LabyrinthVol. 27(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Migration, Identity, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.