The Status of Parliamentary Committee Chairs in the State Duma of VI—VIII Convocations: Legislative Activity and Co-authorship Networks

Using the State Duma of the Russian Federation during its VI—VIII convocations as a case study, this article examines how parliamentary committee chair positions — filled primarily on a professional basis — shape legislative activity and co-authorship networks. After reviewing the State Duma’s Regulations on committee powers and their amendments since 2011, the author analyzes the frequency, subject matter, and success rates of initiatives introduced in collaboration with committee chairs. After that the author examines co-authorship as a network: the graphs constructed on the basis of 5810 bills are used to calculate modularity and density indices, along with the centrality measures aggregated by committee positions. By comparing the resulting metrics across the three convocations, the author traces the evolution of the roles of committee positions in the process of co-authorship and documents the increasing significance of committee chairs, revealing the systemic nature of the observed changes. The overall results of the network and statistical analysis conducted by the author demonstrate the centralization of the co-authorship network on a formal basis — despite the importance of personal lawmaking strategies, the role of a deputy within the network is determined by his position in the committee. The revealed significance of committee position not only from the bureaucratic perspective, but also within the network of cooperation, allows us to take a fresh look at inner parliamentary processes and uncover the rules according to which deputies de facto interact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2025-118-3-32-57
Primary Topic
Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Status of Parliamentary Committee Chairs in the State Duma of VI—VIII Convocations: Legislative Activity and Co-authorship Networks

Nikita Zaripov
The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Historical and Political Studies
article

The Status of Parliamentary Committee Chairs in the State Duma of VI—VIII Convocations: Legislative Activity and Co-authorship Networks

Nikita Zaripov
article en

Abstract

Using the State Duma of the Russian Federation during its VI—VIII convocations as a case study, this article examines how parliamentary committee chair positions — filled primarily on a professional basis — shape legislative activity and co-authorship networks. After reviewing the State Duma’s Regulations on committee powers and their amendments since 2011, the author analyzes the frequency, subject matter, and success rates of initiatives introduced in collaboration with committee chairs. After that the author examines co-authorship as a network: the graphs constructed on the basis of 5810 bills are used to calculate modularity and density indices, along with the centrality measures aggregated by committee positions. By comparing the resulting metrics across the three convocations, the author traces the evolution of the roles of committee positions in the process of co-authorship and documents the increasing significance of committee chairs, revealing the systemic nature of the observed changes. The overall results of the network and statistical analysis conducted by the author demonstrate the centralization of the co-authorship network on a formal basis — despite the importance of personal lawmaking strategies, the role of a deputy within the network is determined by his position in the committee. The revealed significance of committee position not only from the bureaucratic perspective, but also within the network of cooperation, allows us to take a fresh look at inner parliamentary processes and uncover the rules according to which deputies de facto interact.

The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics PoliteiaVol. 118(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.