AI-Powered Fact Verification: Analyzing Public Consensus Through Machine Learning

In the face of rising misinformation across social media platforms, there is a growing need for scalable and automated systems that can verify factual accuracy. This study introduces a machine learning framework that leverages a transformer-based model to evaluate how well social media posts align with factual statements. The framework is tested across various classification strategies, including sentiment analysis, consensus scoring, and both binary and multi-class categorization. Among these approaches, binary classification demonstrated the strongest performance in detecting factual consistency. While sentiment-based methods offered limited insight, they were not sufficient to determine truthfulness on their own. The results highlight the potential of interpretable, high-accuracy models in supporting large-scale efforts to counter misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2e365635.2025.11167439
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Fact Verification: Analyzing Public Consensus Through Machine Learning

Andrew B. Mor
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

AI-Powered Fact Verification: Analyzing Public Consensus Through Machine Learning

Andrew B. Mor
article en

Abstract

In the face of rising misinformation across social media platforms, there is a growing need for scalable and automated systems that can verify factual accuracy. This study introduces a machine learning framework that leverages a transformer-based model to evaluate how well social media posts align with factual statements. The framework is tested across various classification strategies, including sentiment analysis, consensus scoring, and both binary and multi-class categorization. Among these approaches, binary classification demonstrated the strongest performance in detecting factual consistency. While sentiment-based methods offered limited insight, they were not sufficient to determine truthfulness on their own. The results highlight the potential of interpretable, high-accuracy models in supporting large-scale efforts to counter misinformation.

University of the Arts London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.