Shadow AI: Governance, Risk, and Organisational Resilience

The rapid proliferation of generative and predictive AI tools has introduced a new and largely unregulated phenomenon: Shadow AI—the unsanctioned, informal use of artificial intelligence technologies within organisations. This paper conceptualises Shadow AI as a distinct sociotechnical challenge, emerging at the intersection of digital innovation, organisational culture, and governance failure. Through a multi-layered analysis, we develop a typology of Shadow AI use cases, propose a risk classification framework, and explore diverse stakeholder perspectives on its implications. Drawing on anonymised case studies from sectors including healthcare, finance, defence, and education, we demonstrate how Shadow AI introduces systemic vulnerabilities that are poorly addressed by conventional cybersecurity or compliance frameworks. The paper concludes by offering a set of actionable recommendations for organisations, policymakers, and educators, and outlines two forward-looking research agendas focused on secure AI deployment and cyber statecraft. By framing Shadow AI as both a risk and a signal of latent demand, this paper calls for an adaptive, ethically grounded approach to AI governance—one that balances innovation with resilience in an era of decentralised technology use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acdsa65407.2025.11166415
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shadow AI: Governance, Risk, and Organisational Resilience

Esther L. Moss, J. H. Ross, Lee Hibbert
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Shadow AI: Governance, Risk, and Organisational Resilience

Esther L. Moss, J. H. Ross, Lee Hibbert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative and predictive AI tools has introduced a new and largely unregulated phenomenon: Shadow AI—the unsanctioned, informal use of artificial intelligence technologies within organisations. This paper conceptualises Shadow AI as a distinct sociotechnical challenge, emerging at the intersection of digital innovation, organisational culture, and governance failure. Through a multi-layered analysis, we develop a typology of Shadow AI use cases, propose a risk classification framework, and explore diverse stakeholder perspectives on its implications. Drawing on anonymised case studies from sectors including healthcare, finance, defence, and education, we demonstrate how Shadow AI introduces systemic vulnerabilities that are poorly addressed by conventional cybersecurity or compliance frameworks. The paper concludes by offering a set of actionable recommendations for organisations, policymakers, and educators, and outlines two forward-looking research agendas focused on secure AI deployment and cyber statecraft. By framing Shadow AI as both a risk and a signal of latent demand, this paper calls for an adaptive, ethically grounded approach to AI governance—one that balances innovation with resilience in an era of decentralised technology use.

University of Gloucestershire (GB), Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.