Two-Dopant Origin of Competing Stripe and Pair Formation in Hubbard and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> Models

Understanding the physics of the two-dimensional Hubbard model is widely believed to be a key step in achieving a full understanding of high-<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>T</a:mi><a:mi mathvariant="normal">c</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> cuprate superconductors. In recent years, progress has been made by large-scale numerical simulations at finite doping and, on the other hand, by microscopic theories able to capture the physics of individual charge carriers. In this work, we study single pairs of dopants in a cylindrical system using the density-matrix renormalization group algorithm. We identify two coexisting charge configurations that couple to the spin environment in different ways: a tightly bound configuration featuring (next-)nearest-neighbor pairs and a stripelike configuration of dopants on opposite sides of the cylinder, accompanied by a spin domain wall. Thus, we establish that the interplay between stripe order and uniform pairing, central to the models’ phases at finite doping, has its origin at the single-pair level. By interpolating between the Hubbard and the related <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mrow><d:mi>t</d:mi><d:mtext>−</d:mtext><d:mi>J</d:mi></d:mrow></d:math> model, we are able to quantitatively understand discrepancies in the pairing properties of the two models through the three-site hopping term usually omitted from the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mrow><f:mi>t</f:mi><f:mtext>−</f:mtext><f:mi>J</f:mi></f:mrow></f:math> Hamiltonian. This term is closely related to a next-nearest-neighbor tunneling <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:msup><h:mi>t</h:mi><h:mo>′</h:mo></h:msup></h:math>, which we observe to upset the balance between the competing stripe and pair states on the two-dopant level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review X
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/dpfl-12st
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Dopant Origin of Competing Stripe and Pair Formation in Hubbard and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> Models

Fabian Grusdt, Tizian Blatz, Annabelle Bohrdt, Ulrich Schollwöck
1 citations
Physical Review X
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
1.26
article

Two-Dopant Origin of Competing Stripe and Pair Formation in Hubbard and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> Models

Fabian Grusdt, Tizian Blatz, Annabelle Bohrdt, Ulrich Schollwöck
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding the physics of the two-dimensional Hubbard model is widely believed to be a key step in achieving a full understanding of high-<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>T</a:mi><a:mi mathvariant="normal">c</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> cuprate superconductors. In recent years, progress has been made by large-scale numerical simulations at finite doping and, on the other hand, by microscopic theories able to capture the physics of individual charge carriers. In this work, we study single pairs of dopants in a cylindrical system using the density-matrix renormalization group algorithm. We identify two coexisting charge configurations that couple to the spin environment in different ways: a tightly bound configuration featuring (next-)nearest-neighbor pairs and a stripelike configuration of dopants on opposite sides of the cylinder, accompanied by a spin domain wall. Thus, we establish that the interplay between stripe order and uniform pairing, central to the models’ phases at finite doping, has its origin at the single-pair level. By interpolating between the Hubbard and the related <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mrow><d:mi>t</d:mi><d:mtext>−</d:mtext><d:mi>J</d:mi></d:mrow></d:math> model, we are able to quantitatively understand discrepancies in the pairing properties of the two models through the three-site hopping term usually omitted from the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mrow><f:mi>t</f:mi><f:mtext>−</f:mtext><f:mi>J</f:mi></f:mrow></f:math> Hamiltonian. This term is closely related to a next-nearest-neighbor tunneling <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:msup><h:mi>t</h:mi><h:mo>′</h:mo></h:msup></h:math>, which we observe to upset the balance between the competing stripe and pair states on the two-dopant level.

Physical Review XVol. 15(3)
Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE), University of Regensburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.