Not So Fast? Rapid Response to Voice Leads to Perceived Inauthenticity

Employees voice their concerns in the hope that leaders will change their behavior. But how do employees evaluate these changes? In the present research, we highlight the rate of behavior change as a key factor in determining leader evaluations: Leaders are seen as less authentic when they change rapidly in response to employee voice because people believe that true change takes time. We investigate this claim with three studies that adopt a mixed-method approach (n= 3,056). In Study 1, PhD students describe rapid improvement in their advisor’s behavior as less authentic than gradual improvement—even when these changes are desired. In Study 2, we employ a stimulus sampling design to test the robustness of this effect. Followers see rapid improvement as less authentic than gradual improvement across a wide array of leader behaviors. In Study 3, we highlight change difficulty as a moderator and subsequent voice as a downstream consequence: When change is hard, rapid improvement elicits a greater authenticity penalty, which undermines followers’ willingness to voice their concerns in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.1044
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not So Fast? Rapid Response to Voice Leads to Perceived Inauthenticity

Danbee Chon, Francis J. Flynn, Ovul Sezer
Academy of Management Journal
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Not So Fast? Rapid Response to Voice Leads to Perceived Inauthenticity

Danbee Chon, Francis J. Flynn, Ovul Sezer
article en

Abstract

Employees voice their concerns in the hope that leaders will change their behavior. But how do employees evaluate these changes? In the present research, we highlight the rate of behavior change as a key factor in determining leader evaluations: Leaders are seen as less authentic when they change rapidly in response to employee voice because people believe that true change takes time. We investigate this claim with three studies that adopt a mixed-method approach (n= 3,056). In Study 1, PhD students describe rapid improvement in their advisor’s behavior as less authentic than gradual improvement—even when these changes are desired. In Study 2, we employ a stimulus sampling design to test the robustness of this effect. Followers see rapid improvement as less authentic than gradual improvement across a wide array of leader behaviors. In Study 3, we highlight change difficulty as a moderator and subsequent voice as a downstream consequence: When change is hard, rapid improvement elicits a greater authenticity penalty, which undermines followers’ willingness to voice their concerns in the future.

Academy of Management JournalVol. 69(1)
Cornell University (US), University of South Florida (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not So Fast? Rapid Response to Voice Leads to Perceived Inauthenticity — Danbee Chon, Francis J. Flynn, et al. · Academy of Management Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS