An Adaptive Management Model for Brown Bears in Hokkaido: Based on Total Population and the Number of Nuisance Bears

ABSTRACT The brown bear population on Hokkaido Island, once threatened, has now fully recovered. However, this recovery has led to increased conflicts with humans, including injuries and agricultural damage. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of different management strategies using indicators such as the total bear abundance and the number of nuisance bears—both of which serve as measures of extinction risk and human‐wildlife conflict—by employing a population dynamics model. Additionally, we explore scenarios where the management policy is revised every 5 years, both with and without midterm revisions, based on qualitative trends in population size. Our results show that a buffer zone around urbanized areas overlaps with protected areas regardless of its width. However, a 30 km buffer would still leave 24.5% of the protected area outside the zone. Our findings suggest that under the current conditions, where population estimates are both infrequent and imprecise, and the numbers of both total and nuisance bears are high, it is challenging to mitigate conflicts without implementing population control measures. However, our results also suggest that a management approach considering both the total bear population and the number of nuisance bears can maintain low nuisance bear numbers and prevent extinction, provided mid‐term policy revisions are made in response to qualitative changes in population size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Ecology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390x.70004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Adaptive Management Model for Brown Bears in Hokkaido: Based on Total Population and the Number of Nuisance Bears

Hiroyuki Matsuda, S. Horino, Hino Takafumi, Tsutomu Mano et al.
1 citations
Population Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

An Adaptive Management Model for Brown Bears in Hokkaido: Based on Total Population and the Number of Nuisance Bears

Hiroyuki Matsuda, S. Horino, Hino Takafumi, Tsutomu Mano, Akira Maki, Hifumi Tsuruga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The brown bear population on Hokkaido Island, once threatened, has now fully recovered. However, this recovery has led to increased conflicts with humans, including injuries and agricultural damage. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of different management strategies using indicators such as the total bear abundance and the number of nuisance bears—both of which serve as measures of extinction risk and human‐wildlife conflict—by employing a population dynamics model. Additionally, we explore scenarios where the management policy is revised every 5 years, both with and without midterm revisions, based on qualitative trends in population size. Our results show that a buffer zone around urbanized areas overlaps with protected areas regardless of its width. However, a 30 km buffer would still leave 24.5% of the protected area outside the zone. Our findings suggest that under the current conditions, where population estimates are both infrequent and imprecise, and the numbers of both total and nuisance bears are high, it is challenging to mitigate conflicts without implementing population control measures. However, our results also suggest that a management approach considering both the total bear population and the number of nuisance bears can maintain low nuisance bear numbers and prevent extinction, provided mid‐term policy revisions are made in response to qualitative changes in population size.

Population EcologyVol. 68(1)
Yokohama National University (JP), Hokkaido Research Organization (JP), Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (JP)
Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.