Comparison of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy membrane prototypes for bone defect repair made by laser sintering and electron beam melting

A comparative analysis of the microstructure and mechanical properties of guided bone regeneration frame membranes made from Ti6Al4V titanium alloy powder using 3D printing technology is presented in this paper. Two different methods were used to produce the samples: direct laser sintering of metals (DMLS) and electron beam melting (EBM). The plates, measuring 30×10×1 mm, were formed from layers 30 µm thick. The surface morphology of the samples was studied at both the micro and macro levels using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning impulse acoustic microscopy (SIAM). Biocompatibility was assessed both in vitro with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) cultures and in vivo with laboratory animals. Mechanical properties were evaluated using a three-point bending test, which revealed differences in surface profile depth that was 100 and 150 µm for the DMLS and EBM correspondingly. Samples produced using DMLS technology demonstrated higher strength 2,180±20.7 MPa and elasticity 53,449±200 MPa than those produced by EBM strength 1500±26.1 and elasticity 25,633±125 MPa, according to the results of the mechanical tests. A more active proliferation of MSCs was observed in vitro in the DMLS samples, which was 70% higher compared to EMB and the control group. The bone tissue response to both types of titanium implants was good, with high levels of osseointegration, as confirmed by X-ray microtomography (µCT).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Dentistry (Russia)
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37988/1811-153x_2025_3_112
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy membrane prototypes for bone defect repair made by laser sintering and electron beam melting

E.A. Khramtsova, H. M. Nalchajyan, D. Z. Choniashvili, А.А. Мураев et al.
1 citations
Clinical Dentistry (Russia)
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Comparison of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy membrane prototypes for bone defect repair made by laser sintering and electron beam melting

E.A. Khramtsova, H. M. Nalchajyan, D. Z. Choniashvili, А.А. Мураев, S.Yu. Ivanov, А. А. Долгалев, А. Е. Крупнин, Yu. S. Petronyuk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the microstructure and mechanical properties of guided bone regeneration frame membranes made from Ti6Al4V titanium alloy powder using 3D printing technology is presented in this paper. Two different methods were used to produce the samples: direct laser sintering of metals (DMLS) and electron beam melting (EBM). The plates, measuring 30×10×1 mm, were formed from layers 30 µm thick. The surface morphology of the samples was studied at both the micro and macro levels using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning impulse acoustic microscopy (SIAM). Biocompatibility was assessed both in vitro with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) cultures and in vivo with laboratory animals. Mechanical properties were evaluated using a three-point bending test, which revealed differences in surface profile depth that was 100 and 150 µm for the DMLS and EBM correspondingly. Samples produced using DMLS technology demonstrated higher strength 2,180±20.7 MPa and elasticity 53,449±200 MPa than those produced by EBM strength 1500±26.1 and elasticity 25,633±125 MPa, according to the results of the mechanical tests. A more active proliferation of MSCs was observed in vitro in the DMLS samples, which was 70% higher compared to EMB and the control group. The bone tissue response to both types of titanium implants was good, with high levels of osseointegration, as confirmed by X-ray microtomography (µCT).

Clinical Dentistry (Russia)Vol. 28(3)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Sechenov University (RU), Kurchatov Institute (RU), Russian New University (RU), North Ossetian State University (RU), Institute of Biochemical Physics NM Emanuel (RU), Stavropol State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.