Yes to Vedānta, No to Bhakti? Some Philosophical and Religious Novelties of Jasvant Siṃh I’s Brajbhāṣā <i>Prabodha Nāṭaka</i>

This paper focuses on the Prabodha Nāṭaka composed by king Jasvant Siṃh of Mārvāḍ (1626–78). He was a significant political figure in seventeenth century North India, who composed several Brajbhāṣā texts on Vedantic themes. I show that the Prabodha Nāṭaka distinguishes itself from his model, Kr̥ṣṇamiśra’s Sanskrit Prabodhacandrodaya (eleventh century), arguing that the modification of two characters in the intrigue allows us to identify the distinctive discourses Jasvant carried out through his retelling. First, the introduction of Dhīraja (Firmness) seems to correspond to a particular Kṣatriya discourse, through which the ruler advanced a Rajput-inflected interpretation of the Vedāntic drama. Secondly, I analyse the substitution of the anthropomorphised Bhakti with Āstikatā (Affirmerness) or orthodoxy. I then reflect on the view of orthodox traditions represented in the drama. I conclude by exploring why Bhakti has been excluded, considering the political, religious, philosophical and literary trajectories of Siṃh’s compositions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2025.2526924
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yes to Vedānta, No to Bhakti? Some Philosophical and Religious Novelties of Jasvant Siṃh I’s Brajbhāṣā Prabodha Nāṭaka

Rosina Pastore
South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Yes to Vedānta, No to Bhakti? Some Philosophical and Religious Novelties of Jasvant Siṃh I’s Brajbhāṣā Prabodha Nāṭaka

Rosina Pastore
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Prabodha Nāṭaka composed by king Jasvant Siṃh of Mārvāḍ (1626–78). He was a significant political figure in seventeenth century North India, who composed several Brajbhāṣā texts on Vedantic themes. I show that the Prabodha Nāṭaka distinguishes itself from his model, Kr̥ṣṇamiśra’s Sanskrit Prabodhacandrodaya (eleventh century), arguing that the modification of two characters in the intrigue allows us to identify the distinctive discourses Jasvant carried out through his retelling. First, the introduction of Dhīraja (Firmness) seems to correspond to a particular Kṣatriya discourse, through which the ruler advanced a Rajput-inflected interpretation of the Vedāntic drama. Secondly, I analyse the substitution of the anthropomorphised Bhakti with Āstikatā (Affirmerness) or orthodoxy. I then reflect on the view of orthodox traditions represented in the drama. I conclude by exploring why Bhakti has been excluded, considering the political, religious, philosophical and literary trajectories of Siṃh’s compositions.

South Asia Journal of South Asian StudiesVol. 48(4)
Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.