Creating a standard for evaluation of symptoms of depression and anxiety in women undergoing reduction mammaplasty: validation and reliability of HADS

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the measurement properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for patients with breast hypertrophy undergoing breast reduction in the public health care system. Depression and anxiety are two symptoms that can be taken into consideration when patients are evaluated for breast reduction and are part of the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) used to measure the effect of an operation. Methods The HADS was administered to women both pre- and postoperatively. Confirmatory Factor Analysis, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were analysed. Results The study included 276 patients who completed pre-operative HADS assessments, with 52 undergoing test–retest analysis and 52 completing post-operative assessments. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α: HADS-A = 0.85, HADS-D = 0.87), and construct validity showed strong correlations with BDI and BAI and moderate negative correlation with BREAST-Q. Confirmatory factor analysis supported both two- and three-factor models, though the two-factor model was preferred. Test–retest reliability (ICC: HADS-A = 0.81, HADS-D = 0.75) and responsiveness were satisfactory. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusions HADS is a valid tool, with sound psychometric properties, for assessing depression and anxiety in women undergoing breast reduction. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier NCT05233891.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44452-025-00001-9
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating a standard for evaluation of symptoms of depression and anxiety in women undergoing reduction mammaplasty: validation and reliability of HADS

Emma Hansson, Catrin Wessman, Anna Paganini
BMC Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Creating a standard for evaluation of symptoms of depression and anxiety in women undergoing reduction mammaplasty: validation and reliability of HADS

Emma Hansson, Catrin Wessman, Anna Paganini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the measurement properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for patients with breast hypertrophy undergoing breast reduction in the public health care system. Depression and anxiety are two symptoms that can be taken into consideration when patients are evaluated for breast reduction and are part of the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) used to measure the effect of an operation. Methods The HADS was administered to women both pre- and postoperatively. Confirmatory Factor Analysis, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were analysed. Results The study included 276 patients who completed pre-operative HADS assessments, with 52 undergoing test–retest analysis and 52 completing post-operative assessments. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α: HADS-A = 0.85, HADS-D = 0.87), and construct validity showed strong correlations with BDI and BAI and moderate negative correlation with BREAST-Q. Confirmatory factor analysis supported both two- and three-factor models, though the two-factor model was preferred. Test–retest reliability (ICC: HADS-A = 0.81, HADS-D = 0.75) and responsiveness were satisfactory. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusions HADS is a valid tool, with sound psychometric properties, for assessing depression and anxiety in women undergoing breast reduction. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier NCT05233891.

BMC Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryVol. 1(1)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.