TRADITIONAL VS NEXT GENERATION ANTIVIRUS: EVALUATING THEIR ROLE IN MODERN CYBER SECURITY

The rapid evolution of malware has raised questions about the adequacy of traditional antivirus software, which primarily relies on signature-based detection. While effective against known threats, this approach is insufficient for addressing emerging risks such as ransomware, zero-day exploits, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of traditional antivirus solutions and next-generation antivirus (NGAV) systems. Using a review of scholarly literature, industry reports, and case studies, the paper evaluates how artificial intelligence, behavioral analytics, and global threat intelligence contribute to NGAV’s resilience against modern attacks. Findings indicate that NGAV significantly outperforms traditional antivirus in detecting and mitigating advanced threats. The study contributes to the cybersecurity discourse by recommending a hybrid defense framework that leverages the strengths of both approaches to deliver cost-effective and comprehensive endpoint protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70382/hijert.v8i5.010
Primary Topic
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TRADITIONAL VS NEXT GENERATION ANTIVIRUS: EVALUATING THEIR ROLE IN MODERN CYBER SECURITY

A. Umar, Ejinkonye Ifeoma. O, OGHENETEGA AVWOKWURUAYE
Harvard International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
article

TRADITIONAL VS NEXT GENERATION ANTIVIRUS: EVALUATING THEIR ROLE IN MODERN CYBER SECURITY

A. Umar, Ejinkonye Ifeoma. O, OGHENETEGA AVWOKWURUAYE
article en

Abstract

The rapid evolution of malware has raised questions about the adequacy of traditional antivirus software, which primarily relies on signature-based detection. While effective against known threats, this approach is insufficient for addressing emerging risks such as ransomware, zero-day exploits, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of traditional antivirus solutions and next-generation antivirus (NGAV) systems. Using a review of scholarly literature, industry reports, and case studies, the paper evaluates how artificial intelligence, behavioral analytics, and global threat intelligence contribute to NGAV’s resilience against modern attacks. Findings indicate that NGAV significantly outperforms traditional antivirus in detecting and mitigating advanced threats. The study contributes to the cybersecurity discourse by recommending a hybrid defense framework that leverages the strengths of both approaches to deliver cost-effective and comprehensive endpoint protection.

Harvard International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology
Delta State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

TRADITIONAL VS NEXT GENERATION ANTIVIRUS: EVALUATING THEIR ROLE IN MODERN CYBER SECURITY — A. Umar, Ejinkonye Ifeoma. O, et al. · Harvard International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS