Denouncing charlatans at the end of the eighteenth century: the politics of constituting a medical public

Abstract This article explores the porous boundary between medical and political publics at the end of the eighteenth century, based on letters sent to the Société royale de médecine in Paris by provincial surgeons and practitioners denouncing charlatans. In denouncing charlatans for failing to obey the law, for the ineffectiveness of their remedies and for criticizing local authorities, those members of the bourgeoisie who spoke in the name of the public good constituted a public whose judgements had scientific as well as political value. Yet they also excluded from this public people deemed to be ignorant and lacking sufficient social standing. This article shows that the authors of these letters met the expectations of the Société royale de médecine, expectations which are exemplified in its treatment of the Mesmer affair.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
French History
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/craf031
Primary Topic
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Denouncing charlatans at the end of the eighteenth century: the politics of constituting a medical public

Déborah Cohen
French History
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
article

Denouncing charlatans at the end of the eighteenth century: the politics of constituting a medical public

Déborah Cohen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the porous boundary between medical and political publics at the end of the eighteenth century, based on letters sent to the Société royale de médecine in Paris by provincial surgeons and practitioners denouncing charlatans. In denouncing charlatans for failing to obey the law, for the ineffectiveness of their remedies and for criticizing local authorities, those members of the bourgeoisie who spoke in the name of the public good constituted a public whose judgements had scientific as well as political value. Yet they also excluded from this public people deemed to be ignorant and lacking sufficient social standing. This article shows that the authors of these letters met the expectations of the Société royale de médecine, expectations which are exemplified in its treatment of the Mesmer affair.

French HistoryVol. 39(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.