Clinical and data-driven optimization of Genomiser for rare disease patients: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project

Genomiser is a phenotype-driven tool that prioritizes coding and non-coding variants by relevance in rare disease diagnosis; yet comprehensive evaluation of its performance on real-life whole genome sequencing data is lacking. The Hong Kong Genome Project had initially incorporated Exomiser in the diagnostic pipeline. This study evaluated the feasibility of upgrading from Exomiser to Genomiser with three modifications: extension of the interval filter to include ±2000 bp from transcript boundaries, adjusting minor allele frequency (MAF) filter to 3%, and the inclusion of SpliceAI. A total of 985 patients with disclosed whole genome sequencing test results were included in this study, of which 207 positive cases (14 attributed to non-coding variants) were used for Genomiser parameter optimization by means of sensitivity evaluation. Under the default parameter setting, Genomiser achieved lower sensitivity compared to Exomiser (70.15% vs. 72.14%, top-3 candidates; 74.63% vs. 80.60%, top-5 candidates). Further investigation noted that this was attributed to non-coding variant noise influenced by Regulatory Mendelian Mutation (ReMM) scoring metrics. This issue was mitigated when a previously optimized ReMM score was applied as a filtering cut-off (ReMM = 0.963), improving Genomiser's sensitivity (92.54% vs. 89.55%, top-15 candidates). We further evaluated the optimized parameter in a cohort of 778 negative cases and detected 20 non-coding variants (2.6% added yield), with 5 validated to be disease-causing. Our proposed approach adheres to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen variant interpretation guidelines to ensure interpretable results and integrates non-coding variant analysis into clinical pipelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf475
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and data-driven optimization of Genomiser for rare disease patients: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project

Daniel Yeung, Amy H.Y. Tong, Brian Hon‐Yin Chung, Shirley Pik Ying Hue et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Clinical and data-driven optimization of Genomiser for rare disease patients: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project

Daniel Yeung, Amy H.Y. Tong, Brian Hon‐Yin Chung, Shirley Pik Ying Hue, Dicky Or, Wei Ma, Annie Chu, Dingge Ying, Hong Kong Genome Project, Ann Xi
article en

Abstract

Genomiser is a phenotype-driven tool that prioritizes coding and non-coding variants by relevance in rare disease diagnosis; yet comprehensive evaluation of its performance on real-life whole genome sequencing data is lacking. The Hong Kong Genome Project had initially incorporated Exomiser in the diagnostic pipeline. This study evaluated the feasibility of upgrading from Exomiser to Genomiser with three modifications: extension of the interval filter to include ±2000 bp from transcript boundaries, adjusting minor allele frequency (MAF) filter to 3%, and the inclusion of SpliceAI. A total of 985 patients with disclosed whole genome sequencing test results were included in this study, of which 207 positive cases (14 attributed to non-coding variants) were used for Genomiser parameter optimization by means of sensitivity evaluation. Under the default parameter setting, Genomiser achieved lower sensitivity compared to Exomiser (70.15% vs. 72.14%, top-3 candidates; 74.63% vs. 80.60%, top-5 candidates). Further investigation noted that this was attributed to non-coding variant noise influenced by Regulatory Mendelian Mutation (ReMM) scoring metrics. This issue was mitigated when a previously optimized ReMM score was applied as a filtering cut-off (ReMM = 0.963), improving Genomiser's sensitivity (92.54% vs. 89.55%, top-15 candidates). We further evaluated the optimized parameter in a cohort of 778 negative cases and detected 20 non-coding variants (2.6% added yield), with 5 validated to be disease-causing. Our proposed approach adheres to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen variant interpretation guidelines to ensure interpretable results and integrates non-coding variant analysis into clinical pipelines.

Briefings in BioinformaticsVol. 26(5)
Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK)
Queen Mary University of London
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.