Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in biomedical research, but their effectiveness for genomic inquiry remains unclear. We developed GeneTuring, a benchmark consisting of 16 genomics tasks with 1600 curated questions, and manually evaluated 48 000 answers from 10 LLM configurations, including GPT-4o (via API, ChatGPT with web access, and a custom Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) setup), GPT-3.5, Claude 3.5, Gemini Advanced, GeneGPT (both slim and full), BioGPT, and BioMedLM. A custom GPT-4o configuration integrated with National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), developed in this study as SeqSnap, achieved the best overall performance. GPT-4o with web access and GeneGPT demonstrated complementary strengths. Our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of LLMs in genomics, and emphasize the value of combining LLMs with domain-specific tools for robust genomic intelligence. GeneTuring offers a key resource for benchmarking and improving LLMs in biomedical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf492
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring

Xiao Shang, Wenpin Hou, Zhicheng Ji, Xu Liao
5 citations
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
4.03
article

Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring

Xiao Shang, Wenpin Hou, Zhicheng Ji, Xu Liao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in biomedical research, but their effectiveness for genomic inquiry remains unclear. We developed GeneTuring, a benchmark consisting of 16 genomics tasks with 1600 curated questions, and manually evaluated 48 000 answers from 10 LLM configurations, including GPT-4o (via API, ChatGPT with web access, and a custom Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) setup), GPT-3.5, Claude 3.5, Gemini Advanced, GeneGPT (both slim and full), BioGPT, and BioMedLM. A custom GPT-4o configuration integrated with National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), developed in this study as SeqSnap, achieved the best overall performance. GPT-4o with web access and GeneGPT demonstrated complementary strengths. Our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of LLMs in genomics, and emphasize the value of combining LLMs with domain-specific tools for robust genomic intelligence. GeneTuring offers a key resource for benchmarking and improving LLMs in biomedical research.

Briefings in BioinformaticsVol. 26(5)
Duke University (US), New York University (US), Columbia University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.